|
Author
|
Topic: Professional Debate: Scientific Evidence for/against Evolution… “Any Takers?”
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Non creo drivel
I'm no creo but I sure can write creo drivel if you want to go halves on the book rights. First Piece of creo drivel: blood clotting: how does that work? I don't know: therefor God.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 68 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-20-2010 10:26 PM | | Dr Adequate has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Debate
Regardless, a thoughtful and professional response would be appreciated. As an interested lurker it would really help if you used a more thoughtful formatting.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Is Larni in or out?
In. Now all you need to do is present the issue with ToE and we can debate it, here. ABE: it however seems I am out; as I have no higher trainning in the fileds you stipulate. My higher accademic field is psychology. Oh well. Edited by Larni, : ABE:
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
I'm still uncertain what she actually wants. So far she has done bugger all except grandstand. Over.The.Course.Of.18.Months.......
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
Message 148 of 196 (643472)
12-07-2011 9:54 AM
|
Reply to: Message 147 by jar
12-07-2011 9:00 AM
|
|
Re: Gallup Poll Reveals Only 16% Believe Unguided neo-Darwinism Works
To some people science is a democracy.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong. Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 147 by jar, posted 12-07-2011 9:00 AM | | jar has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 149 by jar, posted 12-07-2011 9:58 AM | | Larni has not replied |
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Larni’s Psychology and Indecision
Eye writes: You could be more effective and gain credibility here by posting less irrelevant chat What's that smell, is it.....irony?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
|
Larni
Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
|
|
Message 183 of 196 (672133)
09-03-2012 5:45 PM
|
|
|
At first I was sure the smell was irony. I rather it's actually the stench of defeat. Edited by Larni, : hilarity
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53 The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286 Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
|
™ Version 4.2