|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Which More 3LoT Compatible, Cavediver's Temp.Non-ID Or Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Buz writes:
The still unanswered question was whether you've seen either the singularity or the BB expansion. Straggler writes: What we have seen is increasing entropy. What did it look like, from the time of the alleged singularity up until the present time? For how long have you actually observed a verified net increase in the entropy of the Universe? Would an increase in complexity, order and design from chaotic soup billions of years ago to that which is observe be indicative of observing a net increase in entropy of the Universe? If so, how so? Have you actually observed how far beyond the range of our instruments the Universe extends?
Straggler writes: What we haven't seen is the decreases in entropy that your model demands. This has already debated, relative to the fact that that 2LoT allows for work, via an intelligent engineer affecting the entropy of the universe, as per the Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member (Idle past 312 days) Posts: 16113 Joined: |
What did it look like, from the time of the alleged singularity up until the present time? For how long have you actually observed a verified net increase in the entropy of the Universe? The same amount of time we've observed an absence of flocks of winged pigs playing on flaming tubas.
Would an increase in complexity, order and design from chaotic soup billions of years ago to that which is observe be indicative of observing a net increase in entropy of the Universe? Of course.
If so, how so? Every time we see anything increasing in complexity, order, or design, it does so in a way that increases the net entropy of the universe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined:
|
Take a moment to look around you Buz. Every single event and activity you can see is contributing to increasing, never decreasing, entropy.
Do you understand this? Do you dispute this? You need to answer this simple question if anything remotely resembling progress is to be made here.
Buz writes: What did it look like, from the time of the alleged singularity up until the present time? According to the 2LoT it looked like a system continually increasing in entropy.
Buz writes: For how long have you actually observed a verified net increase in the entropy of the Universe? For as long as observations of anything have been made. The 2nd law of thermodynamics in it's most succinct form is simply ds > 0. I.e. the change in entropy is always positive. There are no observed violations of this.
Buz writes: Would an increase in complexity, order and design from chaotic soup billions of years ago to that which is observe be indicative of observing a net increase in entropy of the Universe? Yes (although your use of the phrase "chaotic soup" is misplaced)
Buz writes: If so, how so? By progressing from a state of low entropy to state of higher entropy in a manner consistent with every observation ever made.
Buz writes: Have you actually observed how far beyond the range of our instruments the Universe extends? No. Are you suggesting that this designer of yours is secretly offsetting ALL of the observed increases in entropy by causing entropy reductions in some area of the universe that is unseen and unobservable?
Buz writes: This has already debated, relative to the fact that that 2LoT allows for work, via an intelligent engineer affecting the entropy of the universe, as per the Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe. When you say "affecting" are you suggesting that this designer of yours is secretly offsetting ALL of the observed increases in entropy by causing corresponding reductions in entropy in some unseen and unobservable way?
Buz writes: This has already debated, relative to the fact that that 2LoT allows for work, via an intelligent engineer affecting the entropy of the universe, as per the Buzsaw's Infinite ID Universe. The 2nd law of thermodynamics tells us that it is not possible to do work to reduce entropy locally without contributing to a net increase in the entropy of the universe as a whole. The 2nd law of thermodynamics tells us that entropy only ever increases, never decreases, overall. No violations of this have ever been observed. If the universe has existed for eternity (as you tell us it has) then according to the second law of thermodynamics the universe would necessarily be in a state of maximum entropy (i.e. heat death) Now you posit the reason for the universe NOT being in a state of maximum entropy to be that some supernatural entity is constantly "managing" the energy within the closed system that is the universe. Given that we have only ever observed increases in entropy and never decreases the only way this supernatural entity of yours can avoid a state a maximum entropy is by undertaking acts of 2nd law defying entropy reversals isn't it? Whether you realise it or not this entity as you have described it would necessitate continual violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Your model necessitates that such violations occur. Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.2 |
I think one of the problems is buzz's inability to understand what the word entropy means. He is throwing out all of science because he misunderstands a word.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Theo writes: I think one of the problems is buzz's inability to understand what the word entropy means. Frankly this almost goes without saying. But being the eternal optimist that I am my hope is that even Buz will start to get a glimmer of why it is that his eternal universe cannot possibly comply with the second law of thermodynamics. Put simply - A non-expanding universe which has existed for eternity and in which every single change in entropy is positive will necessarily be in a state of maximum entropy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Straggler writes: Every time we see anything increasing in complexity, order, or design, it does so in a way that increases the net entropy of the universe. Please explain this and post a reliable link source which agrees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
I didn't write that. Dr Adequate did.
But frankly any link on thermodynamics or entropy will tell you this if you understand it because that (essentially) is what the 2nd LoT is. Perhaps it would aid understanding if you gave us a specific example of something increasing in "complexity order or design" which you think results in a decrease in net entropy and then we can tell you step by step why the change in entropy will actually be positive.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Straggler writes: Put simply - A non-expanding universe which has existed for eternity and in which every single change in entropy is positive will necessarily be in a state of maximum entropy. Stragger you are posting blind, unsupported assertions, choosing to ignore some aspects of my hypothesis. You need to show how you arrive at statements such as the above. For example, you know that 2LoT allows for engineered ID work within the system. You know that my hypothesis includes an eternal ID engineer eternally managing the system. You should know that at least some evidence which I have posted over the 8 years is supportive to the existence of Jehovah, the Biblical god. Whether or not you believe the evidence is reliable, at least, that is what my hypothesis states. In response to my messages, you should either just say you don't believe my premise and move on or respond on the basis of what my hypothesis so as to falsify my position, as I have stated it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 421 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Buz writes: You should know that at least some evidence which I have posted over the 8 years is supportive to the existence of Jehovah, the Biblical god. Sorry Buz but I must have missed that post. Do you have a link to where you actually provided any evidence supportive to the existence of Jehovah, the Biblical god? Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Straggler writes: I didn't write that. Dr Adequate did. But frankly any link on thermodynamics or entropy will tell you this if you understand it because that (essentially) is what the 2nd LoT is. My apologies for the reply mistake. This, again, is a blind assertion. You need to link your source and highlight in it precisely what falsifies my position. I've already posted and highlighted where Wiki, on 2LoT allows for a working designer. Now I want one that contradicts that and an explanation as to how mine is falsified. What I am asking is what I am required to do. What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. No? BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
So - just to be clear - You think the second law of thermodynamics tells us that entropy always increases EXCEPT when intelligent beings decide to impose order in the world and reduce net entropy in doing so.
Is this what you think? Is this the misapprehension that you are asking us to relieve you of?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 93 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Take a moment to look around you Buz. Every single event and activity you can see is contributing to increasing, never decreasing, entropy.
Do you understand this? Do you dispute this? You need to answer this simple question if anything remotely resembling progress is to be made here.
Buz writes: For example, you know that 2LoT allows for engineered ID work within the system. You know that my hypothesis includes an eternal ID engineer eternally managing the system. I do know that. What you haven't told us is how this designer is counteracting all of the observed increases in entropy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Son Member (Idle past 3857 days) Posts: 346 From: France,Paris Joined: |
The problem is what the 2lot doesn't allow for is a global decrease in entropy though. If a designer work within a closed system (like the Universe) and is also part of it, then whatever the intelligent designer does, the entropy will increase. Why do you want science to agree with you? It's obvious you think religion is superior to science so there's no need for you to misrepresent science so that it agrees with you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Son writes: The problem is what the 2lot doesn't allow for is a global decrease in entropy Any change within the system would affect the net of the whole system. No? If not, how so? BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future. Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17827 Joined: Member Rating: 2.3 |
Buz, instead of being cryptic all the time why don't you explain your point. Are you claiming that your "intelligent designer" can decrease the total entropy of the universe ? Just by doing work ? Indefinitely with only a finite amount of energy ? If not, then what is the point of bringing it up at all ?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024