One liners, or how to make the PRATTS fall

Points Refuted A Thousand Times are a common arrow in cdesign proponentsists's quiver. Most of them are short and based on a deep misunderstanding of what the ToE actually says. It occurs to me that part of the reason they persist is precisely because they are short and the point they are trying to make is easy to understand. If this is in fact true, then perhaps the best way to respond to them is an equally short and easy to understand rebuttal. (I completely understand that we aren't going to change the minds of the truly committed cdesign proponentsist. My goal here is to come up with something we can use to persuade those who are on the fence or who don't really know enough about the ToE to see what is wrong with the PRATT.)I would like this thread to be a compilation of one or two line responses that cut to the heart of a PRATT, show why it is wrong and can be used to defeat their nonsense in an informal setting. I will begin with this:PRATT: If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?Response: If Americans emigrated from Europe, why are there still Europeans?Miscellany please.Edited by subbie, : tyop

That works, too.

What PRATT is this a response to?Or is it meant to be a PRATT for us to respond to?Or is it just meaningless word salad?