Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,816 Year: 3,073/9,624 Month: 918/1,588 Week: 101/223 Day: 12/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does EVC supports censorship of the human fetus is a parasite?
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 16 of 43 (652147)
02-12-2012 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:39 PM


There was no censorship, unless of course you are incapable of reading the responses.
Second, when an Admin tells you that a topic is redundant, posting basically the same shit all over again is, ... well, not all that bright.
Is there a point in either of your opening posts?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:39 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:46 PM jar has replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 17 of 43 (652148)
02-12-2012 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by subbie
02-12-2012 4:34 PM


subbie
the people on the xbox/gamestop forums at least tired not to give me cop-outs and other fallacies, maybe you should try.
thanks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by subbie, posted 02-12-2012 4:34 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by subbie, posted 02-12-2012 4:54 PM galerouth has replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 801 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 18 of 43 (652150)
02-12-2012 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:39 PM


Next time you respond to me, try to do it in proper English please. You're the only one who understands your gibberish.

"There is no refutation of Darwinian evolution in existence. If a refutation ever were to come about, it would come from a scientist, and not an idiot." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:39 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:48 PM hooah212002 has replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 19 of 43 (652151)
02-12-2012 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by jar
02-12-2012 4:42 PM


jar
yes, it was -- closed before i could respond because this thread was on other "more popular" forums, is censorship!
"topic is redundant, posting basically the same shit all over again is, ... well, not all that bright."
that's called an opinion, just like your post is cop-out, and please at anytime links wrong, since the whole topic isn't bright.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by jar, posted 02-12-2012 4:42 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by jar, posted 02-12-2012 4:53 PM galerouth has not replied

Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3978
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.3


Message 20 of 43 (652152)
02-12-2012 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:09 PM


Typography
galemouth writes:
thanks for exposing my typos.
Typos?
Mytsify--that's a typo.
Typifying your gibberish as typos would be like calling a maggot-riddled corpse "under the weather".
Nonetheless, you're welcome. I hope you enjoy your stay here in the world of Reason.
Much of it will seem strange, perhaps even incomprehensible to you.
But as long as you continue to reach out, as you have, for authentic, mutually respectful understanding, we will be reaching out, too.

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:09 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:50 PM Omnivorous has replied

Warthog
Member (Idle past 3968 days)
Posts: 84
From: Earth
Joined: 01-18-2012


Message 21 of 43 (652153)
02-12-2012 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by galerouth
02-12-2012 3:31 PM


The definition of a parasitic baby
OK,
I'll take this on...
Although I agree with some of the premise, I think (it's a bit of a scattered post), the core problem with the argument is in the definition.
quote:
"an animal or plant that lives in or on another (the host) from which it obtains nourishment. The host does not benefit from the association and is often harmed by it"
Parasite - definition of parasite by The Free Dictionary
You have selectively chosen a quote which is vague on the definition regarding species. As I understand it, a parasite survives on a host of a different species. On this point, your analogy fails as an embryo is the same species as the host, so the definition does not stand.
e.g. (from Parasite Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com)
parasite
  noun
1.
an organism that lives on or in an organism of another species, known as the host, from the body of which it obtains nutriment.
quote:
not ONE person posted science, law nor the bible to debunk the info inside the " Is the human fetus a parasite according to symbiosis?" wrong...NOT ONE!
so does this deserved censorship because some "butthurt" can't prove it wrong?
So, how did this 'butthurt' do?
Edited by Warthog, : added link
Edited by Warthog, : typo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 3:31 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:55 PM Warthog has replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 22 of 43 (652155)
02-12-2012 4:48 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by hooah212002
02-12-2012 4:45 PM


hooah212002
"Next time you respond to me, try to do it in proper English please. You're the only one who understands your gibberish."
thanks for the cop-out, the info in the first post has yet to be proven wrong by anyone... it's only wiki, for you it shouldn't be that hard.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by hooah212002, posted 02-12-2012 4:45 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by hooah212002, posted 02-12-2012 4:54 PM galerouth has replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 23 of 43 (652156)
02-12-2012 4:50 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Omnivorous
02-12-2012 4:46 PM


Omnivorous
thanks for the cop-out, the facts in the post has yet to be proven wrong by you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Omnivorous, posted 02-12-2012 4:46 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Omnivorous, posted 02-12-2012 6:19 PM galerouth has not replied

Kairyu
Member (Idle past 204 days)
Posts: 162
From: netherlands
Joined: 06-23-2010


Message 24 of 43 (652157)
02-12-2012 4:50 PM


point proven. next?
Yes, it's pretty oblivious that a fetus has parasitical functions, it needs time to develop it's own body functions, blah blah blah. A point of nuance being that the mother body has parts meant specifically to host it, so don't be all dramatic''IT STEALS HER NUTRIENTS'' about it. All mammals are like this, and other species that don't just stick the zygote into a shell with all the nutrients provided. Easy biology.
Now, what do you want to WANT with this simple conclusion? And write it yourself please, since this what we actually discuss here about abortion.

nwr
Member
Posts: 6408
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.1


Message 25 of 43 (652158)
02-12-2012 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by galerouth
02-12-2012 3:31 PM


galerouth writes:
what do you guys think?
I don't think there was any censorship. When I last checked, I could still read your post. All I had to do was click the "Peek" button.
I'm still not clear on the point of that post. It sure seemed trollish.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 3:31 PM galerouth has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 26 of 43 (652159)
02-12-2012 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:46 PM


What are you wanting to discuss, if anything?
Yet you have still never responded in a way that allows anyone to figure out what if any point there was to either opening post.
Do you have a point?
If so, instead of whining why not try telling us what the subject is that you would like to discuss?
Edited by jar, : appalin spallin

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:46 PM galerouth has not replied

subbie
Member (Idle past 1254 days)
Posts: 3509
Joined: 02-26-2006


Message 27 of 43 (652160)
02-12-2012 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:42 PM


the people on the xbox/gamestop forums...
O that I could someday hope to aspire to the level of erudition at an xbox forum!
...at least tired...
Well I can understand that. I'm tired of you now, just 9 posts in.
not to give me cop-outs and other fallacies
I haven't copped out. I've simply chosen not to reply to the substance of anything you've said. And, since nothing I've said (until this present post) has been any kind of argument, there haven' t been any fallacies either. Hint: a "fallacy" is more than just something someone said that you don't like.
maybe you should try.
Haven't seen one reason to yet, but hang in there, maybe someone else will suggest one.
Well, that's enough for now. I'm off to play with some adults for a while. Don't forget nap time or you'll be cranky later on and you'll get no cookies.

Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:42 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 5:03 PM subbie has seen this message but not replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 801 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 28 of 43 (652161)
02-12-2012 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by galerouth
02-12-2012 4:48 PM


Here's the thing: EvC isn't like the "Xbox/Gamestop" forums. We have rules for a reason. When you come along and fling shit like this and fling it in the coffee house section, you aren't going to get the responses you seek. I suggest you do a proposed topic and request it be in the science section but limit it to a few points. That is, of course, if you wish to have a serious discussion. I gather that you don't and will continue to accuse respondents of "copping out".
Play by the rules and you'll get a good discussion. Continue on the same path and you'll get nothing but more chide and derision.

"There is no refutation of Darwinian evolution in existence. If a refutation ever were to come about, it would come from a scientist, and not an idiot." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:48 PM galerouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by galerouth, posted 02-12-2012 4:59 PM hooah212002 has not replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 29 of 43 (652162)
02-12-2012 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Warthog
02-12-2012 4:47 PM


Re: The definition of a parsaitic baby
Warthog
i wish i quote, it doesn't give me the option.
the definition is not vague, because it applies to all organism.
"As I understand it, a parasite survives on a host of a different species."
then what's a parasitic twin? it's a organism of the same species as its host... its brother, so YOU ARE WRONG AND YOUR DEFINITION IS WRONG... I'M RIGHT.
unlike the others, thanks for trying.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Warthog, posted 02-12-2012 4:47 PM Warthog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Warthog, posted 02-12-2012 5:10 PM galerouth has not replied
 Message 36 by RAZD, posted 02-12-2012 5:59 PM galerouth has not replied

galerouth
Junior Member (Idle past 4427 days)
Posts: 15
Joined: 02-08-2012


Message 30 of 43 (652163)
02-12-2012 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by hooah212002
02-12-2012 4:54 PM


hooah212002
"Here's the thing: EvC isn't like the "Xbox/Gamestop" forums. We have rules for a reason"
lol, with your immature cop-outs and insults... which, i thanked you for.
grasping at straws isn't going to help to you.
the links that proves my point are still there in the first post... and they are not hard to read --- prove them wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by hooah212002, posted 02-12-2012 4:54 PM hooah212002 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Trixie, posted 02-12-2012 5:10 PM galerouth has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024