Does EVC supports censorship of the human fetus is a parasite?

If you truly care about the subject, don't copypaste links, but try to write down a coherent story on the spot, and maybe post some sources at the end of the message, if you really must.Abortion debate is a topic that is often debated here, so it truly isn't censoring that is the problem. It's just that it's hard to make sense out of a link pile without ANY direction of the point you're trying to make.

Yes, it's pretty oblivious that a fetus has parasitical functions, it needs time to develop it's own body functions, blah blah blah. A point of nuance being that the mother body has parts meant specifically to host it, so don't be all dramatic''IT STEALS HER NUTRIENTS'' about it. All mammals are like this, and other species that don't just stick the zygote into a shell with all the nutrients provided. Easy biology.Now, what do you want to WANT with this simple conclusion? And write it yourself please, since this what we actually discuss here about abortion.

I shall clarify. A fetus is pretty much a parasite biologically,as I said a while back. However, is a fetus a parasite philosophically? Direct answer please. And no cop-outs. I know you loathe those, so I wouldn't dream of such a thing happening. I'll await your answer..Edited by WSW24, : No reason given.

So, the deeper existential meaning behind every fetus is to be a parasite and leech of it's mother/host? That's what you're saying there. Is this all that there is to it? If you truly believe this, argue when you come back