Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Origin of Life ⇒

An ID hypothesis: Front-loaded Evolution

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An ID hypothesis: Front-loaded Evolution
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9141
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 14 of 216 (653245)
02-19-2012 2:27 PM 		Reply to: Message 10 by Genomicus
02-19-2012 1:43 PM

Huh? I think you mean "word-salad"?
Did you actually post that? Wow. There goes any shred of credibility you might have possibly had.
​
I am willing to think your way of spelling it may have some legitimacy but.. wow!!
​
Oh a quick search shoes "word salad" is the accepted spelling. You have a source that shows otherwise?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Genomicus, posted 02-19-2012 1:43 PM Genomicus has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Genomicus, posted 02-19-2012 2:35 PM Theodoric has not replied
  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9141
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display

(2)
Message 97 of 216 (653628)
02-23-2012 8:13 AM 		Reply to: Message 95 by Chuck77
02-23-2012 6:56 AM

Re: A summary
I wish I could help Genomicus but i've read thru some recent pages and am quite lost. He's being bombarded pretty good by lots of people and he's new.
​
Can anyone someone lay his position out for me in laymans terms? Is he arguing that evolution was front loaded by a creator/deity?
​
Or is he arguing for the IDist POV along with the likes of Behe and Meyer?
​
Like I said this above my pay grade especially the last few posts by Mr Jack and Wounded King so if someone has the time can you summarize his position for me, it's to complicated from the various posts.
​
Not that i'm going to be able to help him but maybe provide some support somehow if I understand it more. Thanks.
​
A reasonable person would stay out of a debate if he does not understand it or if the subject matter is beyond their grasp. You will notice that most "evolutionists" here are staying out of the debate.
​
I find it amazing that you want to support Geno, solely because he has a theistic argument. You do not care if his argument is correct, but it must be because it is theistic. That is disgusting.
​
Oh for just one honest Creo.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Chuck77, posted 02-23-2012 6:56 AM Chuck77 has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by Panda, posted 02-23-2012 12:02 PM Theodoric has replied
  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9141
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 103 of 216 (653663)
02-23-2012 12:46 PM 		Reply to: Message 102 by Panda
02-23-2012 12:02 PM

Re: A summary
On its face ID is Theistic.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Panda, posted 02-23-2012 12:02 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied
  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9141
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.3

Normal Thread Display
Message 155 of 216 (653798)
02-24-2012 9:08 AM 		Reply to: Message 102 by Panda
02-23-2012 12:02 PM

Re: A summary
Geno writes:
​
Alternatively, the front-loading designers could have designed such a population from the start: where some cells have genes for plants, and others have genes for animals.
From
Message 119
​
Still think he is making an agnostic argument?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Panda, posted 02-23-2012 12:02 PM Panda has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 156 by Panda, posted 02-24-2012 10:03 AM Theodoric has not replied
 Message 164 by Genomicus, posted 02-26-2012 5:54 PM Theodoric has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024