Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Awesome Obama Thread II
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 346 of 397 (656124)
03-16-2012 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 336 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:02 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
And the country of Afghanistan did not attack us.
No, it did. The Taliban, which was the ruling government of Afghanistan, gave aid and harbor to bin Laden and the al-Qaeda soldiers who attacked us. That's a matter of historical fact.
We were attacked by Afghanistan via al-Qaeda proxies.
Now, I understand you didn't say Iraq DID attack the US, but you could be explicit and indicate that is WAS immoral and illegal for america to attack Iraq.
It was, likely, not illegal since Saddam had violated the terms of the cease-fire. But it was certainly against American interests to have done so. Saddam was contained; there was no reason to invade.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 336 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:02 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 349 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:26 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 362 by nwr, posted 03-16-2012 6:44 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 363 by onifre, posted 03-16-2012 6:50 PM crashfrog has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 347 of 397 (656125)
03-16-2012 4:20 PM
Reply to: Message 345 by Rahvin
03-16-2012 4:17 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Rahvin writes:
I don't recall anyone suggesting otherwise with regard to Vietnam.
Then I am still misunderstanding.
(The Oni joke was funny, thanks)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 345 by Rahvin, posted 03-16-2012 4:17 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 348 of 397 (656126)
03-16-2012 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 338 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:06 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
You're saying ending the Vietnam war was BAD?
I'm saying that the way it was ended was worse than continuing it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 338 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:06 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 352 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:30 PM crashfrog has replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 349 of 397 (656128)
03-16-2012 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 346 by crashfrog
03-16-2012 4:20 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Crash writes:
We were attacked by Afghanistan via al-Qaeda proxies.
16 out of the 19 9/11 highjackers were . . . Saudi Arabian. Al-Queda was based in . . . . . Saudi Arabia. If the terrorists were the REAL reason for attacking Afghanistan, why don't you include Saudi Arabia in your faulty equation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 346 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:20 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 351 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:29 PM dronestar has replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3265 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


(1)
Message 350 of 397 (656129)
03-16-2012 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 331 by dronestar
03-16-2012 3:34 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
I hate that SENATOR Obama and president Obama (who swore an oath to protect the constitution and its laws) protects Bush Jr from criminal investigation (I have repeatedly wrote about how PRESIDENT Obama intervened in Spain on Bush's account. It doesn't seem to bother any one else).
I used to have daydreams about Obama being sworn in then immediately turning to Bush and Cheney and saying "Arrest those men."
However, impeachment was never a real possibility. I smiled every time it was introduced (a couple times I believe) but never expected it to pass. There just weren't enough votes, and in that case, voting for it would have been a waste of time. It would have been political hara-kiri.
No, Obama did not inherit the wars. SENATOR Obama helped create the wars by funding EVERY war vote (the Vietnam war ended simply because congress stopped funding it). And, as a SENATOR, not supporting the articles of impeachment against Bush Jr.
PRESIDENT Obama inheritied the wars. They were ongoing when he was sworn in. SENATOR Obama was operating under different rules. I'm totally against the Iraq War. I'm a bit more agnostic on the merits of the Afghanistan War. Had I been in office, I would have voted against the AUMF. Once it passed, however, I probably would have ended up voting for funding. Why? Because defunding it with American servicemen and women in harm's way would have been a disaster. When a car is out of control, slamming on the brakes is often the worst thing you can do, you need to apply slow pressure and try to steer your trajectory back under control.
Often in the real world, your ideals come into conflict, both with each other and with the situation as it is. Sticking to your ideals may seem praiseworthy, but if it results in a worse outcome, then your ideals mean nothing. It takes an intelligent and strong person to be able to navigate that sort of mine field, especially on the scale of a war, and they are bound to make mistakes.
In effect, you are offering me the steering wheel AFTER the car has left the cliff. (I suppose I can now at least take my foot off the gas pedal.) Outside of america, the US has no credibility and are seen as immoral and illegal invaders. The UN is not perfect, but it is a better choice. The quicker the changeover the better.
Exactly. This is the position PRESIDENT Obama found himself in. You are now criticizing his actions since being elected. I'm just curious as to how you would have gone about it, had you been placed in his position in January of 2009.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 331 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 3:34 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 355 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:44 PM Perdition has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 351 of 397 (656130)
03-16-2012 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 349 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:26 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
16 out of the 19 9/11 highjackers were . . . Saudi Arabian. Al-Queda was based in . . . . . Saudi Arabia.
And? So what? The 9/11 attacks were planned in Afghanistan, ordered from Afghanistan, by bin Laden who was supported by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
You really think there was no connection between Afghanistan and 9/11? That we just invaded a country at random?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 349 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:26 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 353 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:33 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 357 by onifre, posted 03-16-2012 5:01 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 352 of 397 (656131)
03-16-2012 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 348 by crashfrog
03-16-2012 4:21 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Crash writes:
I'm saying that the way it was ended was worse than continuing it.
During the VN war, THREE MILLION VIETNAMESE DIED. You think it was better to continue that bloodletting?
This is a huge different topic. Please, if you need to, take ONE last reply and start a different thread if you feel like it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 348 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:21 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 354 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:37 PM dronestar has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 353 of 397 (656132)
03-16-2012 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 351 by crashfrog
03-16-2012 4:29 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Crash writes:
You really think there was no connection between Afghanistan and 9/11? That we just invaded a country at random?
If you think that I believe america chose Afghanistan randomly to invade, then you haven't been paying attention to any of my posts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 351 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:29 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 354 of 397 (656134)
03-16-2012 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 352 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:30 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
You think it was better to continue that bloodletting?
I think that an orderly withdrawal would have been better than the hasty, clumsy withdrawal prompted by Congress' defunding of the war. Who said anything about continuing the "bloodletting"?
This is a huge different topic.
No, it's just another example of how you don't know what you're talking about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 352 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:30 PM dronestar has not replied

  
dronestar
Member
Posts: 1417
From: usa
Joined: 11-19-2008
Member Rating: 6.4


Message 355 of 397 (656135)
03-16-2012 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 350 by Perdition
03-16-2012 4:29 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Perd writes:
Exactly. This is the position PRESIDENT Obama found himself in. You are now criticizing his actions since being elected. I'm just curious as to how you would have gone about it, had you been placed in his position in January of 2009.
Is my type appearing blue on a blue background and it can't be read? To re-re-reiterate . . .
Obama had desperately tried to EXTEND the Iraq war occupation. I correctly predicted it when I argued Kerusa years ago on this forum. If precedence continues, Obama will try, somehow, to extend the Afghanistan occupation (unless Obama has invaded Iran in the near future, then . . . ?). I've read rumors Obama is trying to lock in 10 year military base agreements, so don't be surprised.
Everyone have a good weekend, heard the weather in the NE is gonna be real good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 350 by Perdition, posted 03-16-2012 4:29 PM Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 356 by Perdition, posted 03-16-2012 4:52 PM dronestar has replied
 Message 358 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 5:20 PM dronestar has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3265 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 356 of 397 (656137)
03-16-2012 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 355 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:44 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Is my type appearing blue on a blue background and it can't be read? To re-re-reiterate . . .
Apparently mine is as well. I'm asking for your plan, not merely pointing to the things Obama did that you disagree with. Tell me what you would have done with both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars from January 2009.
I've read rumors Obama is trying to lock in 10 year military base agreements, so don't be surprised.
This is SOP. We still have bases in Germany. We still have bases in Italy. We still have bases in South Korea.
I would hope any bases built would be approved by the Afghani government. It would then give us a base of operations to continue trying to round up Al Qaeda cells in the area. It would also help us to continue helping the Afghani police and military secure their own country, should they ask for help.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 355 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:44 PM dronestar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 387 by dronestar, posted 03-19-2012 11:10 AM Perdition has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2978 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 357 of 397 (656138)
03-16-2012 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 351 by crashfrog
03-16-2012 4:29 PM


I wish Hicks was still alive.
And? So what? The 9/11 attacks were planned in Afghanistan, ordered from Afghanistan, by bin Laden who was supported by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Good little sheep, good. Don't foget to tell him it was all planned out from a cave, too. One guy, a mastermind if you will. An evil mastermind from a wacky religion who hates freedom planned and orchestrated the entire event, from a cave, in Afghanistan.
"Go back to bed, America, your government is in control."
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 351 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 4:29 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1494 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 358 of 397 (656140)
03-16-2012 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 355 by dronestar
03-16-2012 4:44 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Obama had desperately tried to EXTEND the Iraq war occupation.
"Desperately"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 355 by dronestar, posted 03-16-2012 4:44 PM dronestar has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 359 of 397 (656145)
03-16-2012 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 337 by Rahvin
03-16-2012 4:02 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
Hi, Rahvin.
I'll get to a reply later when I have a few moments.
Right now the thread is moving at more-heat-than-light speed, and I don't like to move that way anymore.
Back soon.

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 337 by Rahvin, posted 03-16-2012 4:02 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
nwr
Member
Posts: 6412
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 4.5


(1)
Message 360 of 397 (656156)
03-16-2012 6:33 PM
Reply to: Message 329 by crashfrog
03-16-2012 2:29 PM


Re: Arguments of sovereignty, back on the table . . .
nwr writes:
On the other hand, I disagreed with our invasion of Afghanistan.
crashfrog writes:
I wonder if you could elaborate.
What's to elaborate? It should have been obvious all along, that we cannot solve the problems of Afghanistan. Only the Afghan people can do that.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 329 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 2:29 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 365 by crashfrog, posted 03-16-2012 8:01 PM nwr has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024