Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
9 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Labor Pains In Colorado
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 31 of 166 (656323)
03-17-2012 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Jon
03-17-2012 4:10 PM


How much less do you think it is, Jon? Do you think it's half?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Jon, posted 03-17-2012 4:10 PM Jon has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 32 of 166 (656327)
03-17-2012 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Buzsaw
03-17-2012 4:13 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
That's amazing Buz.
Union workers are not middle class?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 4:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 10:00 PM jar has replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 166 (656336)
03-17-2012 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by RAZD
03-17-2012 4:23 PM


No, but under the social contract it is his obligation to pay a fair wage for work performed.
What social contract? What obligation?
How you judge fair wage is by how much it can support a small family.
Who says that's fair?
The picture I posted above show graphically why there is so much poverty in the US.
Because rent is too high?
If you claim it isn't then provide the evidence.
You need to show that your statistics are reasonably relevant. That means showing that you considered the appropriate variables when crunching the numbers.
Jon

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by RAZD, posted 03-17-2012 4:23 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 34 of 166 (656337)
03-17-2012 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by hooah212002
03-17-2012 4:14 PM


I've already explained why that is not always the case.
Why should your employer care that you want to live in a two-bedroom apartment instead of a one-bedroom?

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by hooah212002, posted 03-17-2012 4:14 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by hooah212002, posted 03-17-2012 8:19 PM Jon has replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 823 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 35 of 166 (656346)
03-17-2012 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Jon
03-17-2012 6:44 PM


Companies are more important than people, right? Americans shouldn't expect a living wage so long as they get a wage. Forgive me if I think America is a first world country.

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Jon, posted 03-17-2012 6:44 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Jon, posted 03-17-2012 8:27 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Jon
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 166 (656348)
03-17-2012 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by hooah212002
03-17-2012 8:19 PM


Companies are more important than people, right?
Of course.
Americans shouldn't expect a living wage so long as they get a wage.
Of course.
I think America is a first world country.
Of course.

Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by hooah212002, posted 03-17-2012 8:19 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 166 (656358)
03-17-2012 10:00 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by jar
03-17-2012 5:12 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
jar writes:
That's amazing Buz.
Union workers are not middle class?
They are indeed middle class, Jar. However, they not only oppose right to work and prevent competitive bidding on behalf of middle class taxpayers but shoot themselves in the foot by causing companies to move their operations abroad, etc.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by jar, posted 03-17-2012 5:12 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by jar, posted 03-17-2012 10:12 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 39 by hooah212002, posted 03-18-2012 10:49 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 41 by crashfrog, posted 03-18-2012 9:36 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 42 by frako, posted 03-19-2012 8:19 AM Buzsaw has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(1)
Message 38 of 166 (656361)
03-17-2012 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
03-17-2012 10:00 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
So you admit that they are middle class.
Are you saying that Americans should not have the right to band together to negotiate wages and working conditions?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 10:00 PM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied

hooah212002
Member (Idle past 823 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


(3)
Message 39 of 166 (656402)
03-18-2012 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
03-17-2012 10:00 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
prevent competitive bidding on behalf of middle class taxpayers but shoot themselves in the foot by causing companies to move their operations abroad, etc.
Oh, you mean they prevent companies from being able to pay American workers shit wages.....as if that is a bad thing?
Why do you hate American workers so much? Why do you love your corporate overlords more than your fellow man?

"Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off." -Dawkins

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 10:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Phat, posted 03-18-2012 9:00 PM hooah212002 has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18310
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


(1)
Message 40 of 166 (656456)
03-18-2012 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by hooah212002
03-18-2012 10:49 AM


Re: Who's To Blame
Hooah,responding to Buzsaw writes:
Why do you hate American workers so much? Why do you love your corporate overlords more than your fellow man?
Like I said before, I try and see how all sides think on these issues. A business quite naturally seeks competitive bids on labor costs...which is why many businesses relocated overseas, where labor costs are less. I don't like seeing labor reduced to simply a line item expense, with no loyalty (for US workers) favoritism, or preference factored in. The cold reality of global competition is one of the major downsides to a free market system.
As a group, we safeway workers have learned more skills about other jobs in the store, worked harder and harder each year, and agreed to wage increases lower than what we wanted.
We believe that our skills are competitive...indeed, the company has been unsuccessful at attracting many new workers who want to stay around very long.
What worries me is the fact that the corporation may simply decide to pull out of the Colorado market, sell off the stores, and relocate to God knows where. Corporations have no conscience except to their own...and their own are usually upper management as opposed to lower labor.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by hooah212002, posted 03-18-2012 10:49 AM hooah212002 has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


(2)
Message 41 of 166 (656458)
03-18-2012 9:36 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
03-17-2012 10:00 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
However, they not only oppose right to work and prevent competitive bidding on behalf of middle class taxpayers but shoot themselves in the foot by causing companies to move their operations abroad, etc.
Buz, a Chinese auto worker makes roughly $120 a month and works a 12-hour shift.
Unions or not, what American could possibly work for that? Even wages at the non-union auto plants in right-to-work states aren't anywhere close to that low. Who would spend 12 hours a day at a job that wouldn't even cover rent? A fifth of the rent? That's like paying money to work.
I mean, I'll meet you halfway - I think many unions have entrenched their power at the expense of the workers they represent; I think they've crafted rules that made sense at the time, but now leave union shops unable to adapt to changing circumstances. I think unions do too much to shelter the incompetent and extract rents. But come on, you can't lay offshoring at the feet of unions. There are just no circumstances under which an American could underbid the Chinese wage schedule because the GDP and cost of living between the two nations is just so different. And you may not be aware but all Chinese workers are unionized.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 10:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

frako
Member (Idle past 327 days)
Posts: 2932
From: slovenija
Joined: 09-04-2010


(3)
Message 42 of 166 (656483)
03-19-2012 8:19 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
03-17-2012 10:00 PM


Re: Who's To Blame
They are indeed middle class, Jar. However, they not only oppose right to work and prevent competitive bidding on behalf of middle class taxpayers but shoot themselves in the foot by causing companies to move their operations abroad, etc.
Do you actually believe that the rich folk would gladly make life easier for the rest if they yust have enough money and the evil workers who dont want to work 16 hrs a day are the ones holding worker standards back.
Before there where unions workers worked 16 hour days 7 days a weak, children where prefered workers because their wages where even lower then those of women.
But one day workers had enough they went on strike even wrecked the machines of those days and thus forced the ritch to give the workers a larger share of the pie, no children working, equal pay for women ....
Nowdays the ritch had a new idea the workers in industrialised countries cost too much and dont want to work 16 hours a day but if we move to africa or china they will be glad to do so.
The only way those factories that have moved to cheaper areas would stay is if your labure force would be willing to work 16 hour days 7 days a weak for 1$ a weak. And if there where no unions you would already be working like that for that kind of pay.

Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
Click if you dare!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 03-17-2012 10:00 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by rueh, posted 03-19-2012 11:45 AM frako has not replied

Artemis Entreri 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4250 days)
Posts: 1194
From: Northern Virginia
Joined: 07-08-2008


Message 43 of 166 (656500)
03-19-2012 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by RAZD
03-17-2012 10:38 AM


How about a 1 bedroom? why does one worker need two bedrooms? if you are suggesting it is for a family then, you should take into account that there will be two people working, and if both are working at minimum wage then you need to divide the hours on your graph by two, and then well use can see that two people working at the minimum wage can get by in most if not all the states.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by RAZD, posted 03-17-2012 10:38 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Perdition, posted 03-19-2012 5:01 PM Artemis Entreri has replied

rueh
Member (Idle past 3683 days)
Posts: 382
From: universal city tx
Joined: 03-03-2008


Message 44 of 166 (656502)
03-19-2012 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by frako
03-19-2012 8:19 AM


Re: Who's To Blame
Frako writes:
The only way those factories that have moved to cheaper areas would stay is if your labure force would be willing to work 16 hour days 7 days a weak for 1$ a weak. And if there where no unions you would already be working like that for that kind of pay.
Or if consumers would stop buying products from companies that out source their labor. Though in reality it would probably be easier to get companies to hire Americans then it would be to get Americans to stop shopping Wal-Mart.

'Qui non intelligit, aut taceat, aut discat'
The mind is like a parachute. It only works when it is open.-FZ
The industrial revolution, flipped a bitch on evolution.-NOFX
It takes all kinds to make a mess- Benjamin Hoff

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by frako, posted 03-19-2012 8:19 AM frako has not replied

Perdition
Member (Idle past 3259 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


(3)
Message 45 of 166 (656533)
03-19-2012 5:01 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Artemis Entreri
03-19-2012 11:18 AM


f you are suggesting it is for a family then, you should take into account that there will be two people working
Single parents aren't a family?
A spouse that is unable to work, for whatever reason, suddenly makes them not a family?
if both are working at minimum wage then you need to divide the hours on your graph by two, and then well use can see that two people working at the minimum wage can get by in most if not all the states.
Assuming both get 40 hours, they may be able to afford a two-bedroom apartment. Of course, that assumes they don't eat food, don't buy any toys or clothes for themselves or their kid(s), have free transportation to everywhere they need to go, don't need electricity, water, heat, or a phone...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Artemis Entreri, posted 03-19-2012 11:18 AM Artemis Entreri has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by hooah212002, posted 03-19-2012 6:01 PM Perdition has not replied
 Message 48 by Artemis Entreri, posted 03-20-2012 2:15 PM Perdition has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024