|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Athiest Manifesto | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
Interesting piece (I thought)...
Main points: 1. Athiests are naturalists2. First Commitment is to the truth 3. We respect Scence, Not Scientism 4. Reason is precious 5. Reject Dogma 6. Accept that Athieism will not have answers and are prepared for that 7. Are Secularists 8. Athiests can be religious(?) 9. Religion isn't all bad. 10. Are Critical of religion hen necessary It's a fairly inoccuous piece but I'm interested to hear some folks views on this article... Are you in agreement? IS it a pile of Crap? Atheists, please read my heathen manifesto | Julian Baggini | The Guardian Edited by Heathen, : formatting Edited by Heathen, : link replaced with working one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
Our notion of truth should itself be subject to examination and criticism. So it's a mistake to make such a commitment.
I don't see where he says it shouldn't. I think here he is saying that truth is paramount, rather than dogma, belief, wishful thinking etc.
What does that even mean? The reason that comes from creationists is often worthless
I think he agrees when he says Reason is precious, but also fragile.
That's yet another reason to wonder what Baggini takes "atheism" to mean
I took this to mean that Atheism doesn't provide big answers in the same way a belief system does. and that is accepted.
But you don't have to be an atheist to be a secularist.
I don't think that he suggested otherwise.
That one is straight from the Baggini lunatic asylum.
yeah, this struck me as a strange one. I guess it depends on what he defines "religious" as
Why should I be expected to make sweeping generalizations?
again I'm not sure where the article suggests you do this. Are you reading the same article?
But why does that require criticizing religion as a whole?
again, I think that's what he means by "when necessary"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
The term "atheism" does not refer to a central principle, but to the lack of any central principle.
Surely one central principle would be: having no belief in a divine creator/god?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
I guess you're right except Stamp collectors aren't trying to exert influence in schools/governments, so perhaps there's not so much of a need for an opposing position.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
The first point you missed was actually the rejection of the term 'atheist' and the adoption of the term 'heathen'. He does not call it the atheist manifesto but the heathen manifesto - I would have thought you'd have liked this given your screen-name.
The naming didn't strike me as central to the article. Or at least not central to what I was interested in getting views on. Neither did the final point which talks about "Forging Links"
Furthermore, you managed to spell 'atheists' wrong every time.
hey ho... everyone seems to have understood anyway..
but a loosening of the definition of religion I think that's key to this particular point. Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
It's entertaining that some atheists feel such a strong need to mirror religion that they can simultaneously define themselves as having no dogma while publishing their own version of the Apostles Creed.
I think it's more about being recognised as a section of society. A section who do not wish to give undue deference to religion, a section who does not wish to see crimes that would otherwise be considered hateful or bigoted being accepted as part of a persons faith. A section of society who do not wish to be absorbed into a default position of Christian, or CofE or whatever.I don't think this article represents dogma, but rather an attempt to write down a series of principles which, the author thinks, represent a common thread in atheists/heathens or what ever you choose to be called. It's far from perfect but, the idea that there is a part of society, not insignificant in number, who reject the "accepted" norms of religion is good, but as long as the members of that section of society just carry on, head down, allowing themselves to be counted as part of some other majority by virtue of their silence, the 'majority' are more likely to have a stronger, unopposed, mandate
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
I don't think it's as prescriptive as you seem to.
merely collating what he sees are the central 'tenets' of Atheism or Heathenism
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
ok... bad example..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
a. One who is regarded as irreligious...or unenlightened Seems to fit pretty closely. Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
Why did you choose to specifically replace his choice of word 'heathen' with 'atheist'?
because he uses the word Heathen as a more palatable, less loaded alternative. His ultimate meaning is the same. He states that.
Edit In fact, reading what he actually says, why did you choose to misrepresent it
I'm not sure I did misrepresent, I basically took the first few words of each point he made and listed them here.I left out the name change from Athiest to Heathen, and the declaration about this manifesto being about forging links etc. calm yourself.. I didn't set out to misrepresent or twist anything that he had written, if I had, posting the link kinda defeats the purpose dontcha think? if it makes you feel better just comment on the article in the link, and ignore my bullet points. sheesh. Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
You really are a tool arent you.
Fuck you. And take your personal attacks elsewhere.
make a lame ass point
I wasn't making a "lame ass" point you gimp.I posted this in coffee house cos I thought it may be of interest. Nothing more. If you don't like don't read. The author of the article is pretty informally deciding on a more appropriate title for athiests, in his opinion.Athiests are considered "irreligious, uncivilized, or unenlightened" by many religious folk. I put an elipsis in to highlight the two descriptions I felt were more common.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
Ok.
this is a journalistic, comment-section-of-the-paper type article so I don't think getting hung up on the minutae of definitions serves any purpose. Strictly speaking you're right, it is not technically a manifesto, it is a list of things that atheism means to this guy. (that is to say it's written more to be descriptive and prescriptive) I guess my reason for posting this was to find out which bits of it people here do/do not identify with. purely an exercise for interest sake. nothing more. Edited by Heathen, : No reason given. Edited by Heathen, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
You then write a manifesto telling these members what they believe and don't believe yeah, I don't read it as him telling people what they do/don't should/shouldn't believe. I think it's far more passive than that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
quote:it is the "connotations" he is unhappy with. not the meaning. quote:He wants to find an "alternative" word for "atheist". to avoid the "connotations", not change the meaning. quote:again, referncing "atheism" as the word he wants to find an "alternative" for, to avoid "unhelpful connotations" not change the meaning. quote:So. "heathen" works as an "alternative" title to "Atheist" in order to avoid the "unhelpful connotations" The author of the piece feels that heathen is an acceptable alternative to atheist. If you disagree. good for you, articulate your disagreement.but save yourself the energy you expend in going after me. As I said, I posted this here to get some opinions, not to be an apologist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heathen Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 1067 From: Brizzle Joined: |
Is it really that hard to spell the word correctly?
No, not hard, but I'm posting here while working. so time for spell checking isn't available.I'm sorry you find it so offensive.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024