Taken from
Message 549 for discussion.
quote:
If I have insulted anyone in that thread like the way I am being insulted whatever penalty is given out to the members doing it to me i'll accept the same.
I found the comment Dr Adequate responded to far nastier - and insulting - than the comment made by Dr. Adequate, who merely suggests that your argument would look silly in a courtroom.
Establishing "facts" to fit the theory maybe. If you cannot provide examples of micro-evolution happening with evidence of witnesses then how is it factual? Or is it just assumed and speculated?
If you merely have questions about the evidence then why is the first sentence in the quote even needed ? Leave out the insinuations and the hostility and then you might be able to complain about being mistreated.
Even leaving the exaggerations of CSI behind us, it is true, is it not that forensic evidence - such as ballistic markings, fibres, fingerprints and DNA matching are given considerable weight in the judicial system ? Do you suggest that this is a fraud designed to support the prosecution ? If you do not then you not only concede Dr. Adequate's point, you were also being premature in your own comments.