Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,816 Year: 3,073/9,624 Month: 918/1,588 Week: 101/223 Day: 12/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Applying Ocam's Razor To BB vs Biblical ID Creationism and EvC
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 34 (662903)
05-20-2012 7:47 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by crashfrog
05-19-2012 10:31 PM


Re: Pertaining To 1LoT
crashfrog writes:
Then you've committed the fallacy of the looming caveat; crystals are incredibly common, most elements and compounds can be induced to adopt a crystalline structure under quite prosaic conditions, and usually they do so because the enthalpy change of the system under those conditions as it crystalizes exceeds the entropy loss.
That happens all over the place, Buz, and it's not just something you can sweepingly dismiss with a "by and large." It's a direct and omnipresent counterexample that you can't just pretend is nonexistent.
Apples & oranges, Crashfrog. The forming of crystals involves a lot less time, and work. On the other hand, the creation of a complex human body from chaotic dirt would require intelligent planning and work. To apply life, soul and spirit to the formed body would requre more complex work. The formation of crystals, etc, requires no intellgent planning or thought, nor does it involve life.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by crashfrog, posted 05-19-2012 10:31 PM crashfrog has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 34 (662905)
05-20-2012 7:56 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Tangle
05-20-2012 7:25 AM


Re: Evidence of Observed Phenomena
tangle writes:
Simply saying it's so, doesn't make it so, Buz.
You keep claiming to have provided evidence for the belief in a creationist god, but so far I haven't seen any that counts as real evidence - just spectulation and assumption plus a huge pile of many times refuted error.
What's your best shot at real evidence?
Thanks for making my point, Tangle. You catagorically and dogmatically deny the cited evidence. All one need do is check out my 8 year profile and review all of the evidence cited. None of this cited evidence will ever be acknowledged by you. To do so sould refute your own positions which run counter to Ocam's Razor.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Tangle, posted 05-20-2012 7:25 AM Tangle has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 33 of 34 (662906)
05-20-2012 8:05 AM


Topics related to the creation/evolution debate must be submitted for consideration to the Proposed New Topics forum. I'm closing this thread and moving it to Proposed New Topics now.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 34 of 34 (662940)
05-20-2012 8:05 AM


Thread Copied to Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied to the Applying Ocam's Razor To BB vs Biblical ID Creationism and EvC thread in the Proposed New Topics forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024