That is not the debate that I've invited him to. I have proposed a systematic exposition of the facts, which he can attempt to dispute, not that I should refute a random jumble of stuff that creationists have made up. If he wants to do that, he should do it one topic at a time, like everyone else.
I will, if he likes, debate his random assortment of errors --- in fact, as you can see if you look, I'm presently doing so on another thread. The question is: will he also be willing to debate me in the proposed format?