Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Unpaid Work For The Unemployed
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 1 of 300 (665212)
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


In the UK at the moment there is a debate rumbling on about the nature of unpaid work for the unemployed. Link
On one hand this (as the link suggests) is seen as free labour for multi-million dollar companies and obvious exploitation of the unemployed.
On the other hand many argue that this provides valuable work experience for those in danger of becoming effectively unemployable if they just remain long term on benefits. Link
Who is right and who is wrong?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Panda, posted 06-10-2012 10:40 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 6 by Larni, posted 06-10-2012 11:09 AM Straggler has not replied
 Message 8 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-10-2012 11:28 AM Straggler has replied
 Message 9 by Trixie, posted 06-10-2012 12:28 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 15 by Dr Adequate, posted 06-10-2012 3:35 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 16 by Jon, posted 06-10-2012 5:31 PM Straggler has not replied
 Message 22 by Panda, posted 06-11-2012 10:07 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3713 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 2 of 300 (665213)
06-10-2012 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


Straggler writes:
On one hand this (as the link suggests) is seen as free labour for multi-million dollar companies...
Would this not be an issue if all the work was with local councils, charities, etc.?

CRYSTALS!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:34 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:47 AM Panda has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 3 of 300 (665214)
06-10-2012 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Panda
06-10-2012 10:40 AM


I think some of the work placements are more like that. And they certainly seem to be less controversial than the ones involving Tescos, Primark, Hilton et al.
In answer to your question - I think it would be less of an issue. Because the accusation of exploitation in the form of free labour for profit is what seems to really get people's backs up.
Giving the unemployed work experience I don't think many object to in principle.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Panda, posted 06-10-2012 10:40 AM Panda has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 06-10-2012 10:49 AM Straggler has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 300 (665215)
06-10-2012 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:47 AM


How many unemployed people are without work experience?

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:47 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:58 AM jar has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 5 of 300 (665216)
06-10-2012 10:58 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by jar
06-10-2012 10:49 AM


I don't know. We have a problem with youth unemployment in this country (and across Europe) and I guess that some of those may never have been employed at all. Also there are those who have been unemployed for extended periods (the "long term unemployed") who may have worked at one point but who have lost the "habit" of work and who might arguably benefit from work experience for that reason.
But - to explicitly get back to the actual question you ask - I'm not sure if there even are stats for those who are unemployed but who have never worked.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 06-10-2012 10:49 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 06-10-2012 11:10 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 164 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 6 of 300 (665218)
06-10-2012 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


When I was at school we had arranged work experience to give us experience in the work place. This was seen a valuable experience mixing with grown ups and seeing how work got done in the real world.
This notion of making people work for their benefit seems okay to me, but when you have big companies potentially using this labour source as opposed to paying a living wage I can appreciate the problems many will have.
If people on benefit are going to get 'encouraged' to do work to access their benefits they should be 'encouraged' to work in socially, ethically and environmentally sound endeavours: rather than being cheap shelf stackers for Tescos.
All that that will teach them is self stacking is shit.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:34 AM Straggler has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 300 (665219)
06-10-2012 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:58 AM


Old and Cold
On this side of the pond, as I imagine it is on your side, the issue is complex. There is a continuing influx of young people with little or no job experience, but there is also a large body of experienced workers who are, quite frankly, considered old.
What we are seeing here is a rush of early retirement, people applying for Social Security at the first possible minimum age. We have a very large body of unemployed folk that are unemployed because they are thought to be overqualified.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:58 AM Straggler has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 300 (665221)
06-10-2012 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


On one hand this (as the link suggests) is seen as free labour for multi-million dollar companies and obvious exploitation of the unemployed.
On the other hand many argue that this provides valuable work experience for those in danger of becoming effectively unemployable if they just remain long term on benefits. Link
Who is right and who is wrong?
Looks like they're both right, and neither is wrong. We'd need some data to do any figurin' and I'm afraid there's not gonna be enough on this kinda stuff :-\

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:34 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 1:11 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3706 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


(2)
Message 9 of 300 (665227)
06-10-2012 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


Ethical?
Where I have a problem is large companies using unpaid labour to carry out functions essential to their operations as a way of cost-cutting. All this does is increase the profits for their shareholders on the back of unpaid workers. If a large company needs the work done, they should employ people to do it. Given the choice of a free worker or one they have to pay, which one do you think they will choose?
I have no problem with work experience being carried out in charities and voluntary organisations or with councils etc. However, we also have a major problem with people who have been chucked of Incapacity Benefit, landing them on the heap of unemployed, yet they are unfit for work. For example, what work can you send an agoraphobic to do when they can't even get out their front door? Therehave been cases of people instructed to walk a certain distance at their medical examinations who have had to be taken to hospital because they collapsed while trying, yet have subsequently declared "fit" for work.There's even been a case where the building used for medical examinations has no disabled access, resulting in people failing to turn up because they can't get in and so declared fit, or they have got out of wheelchairs and used crutches to negotiate the entrance while their helper bumps the wheelchair up the steps. Unbeknownst, they have been observed doing this as part of their medical and declared able to walk and fit for work.
Did you know that the medics who carry out these medicals are paid a bonus for every person they get off disability and on toJobseekers' Allowance? A friend was forced off disability because his stammer wasn't bad enough, according to the medic who examined him. The problem is that my friend's disability had absolutely nothing to do with a stammer - he'd never stammered in his life! It took him a year to sort that out, meanwhile he couldn't claim Jobseekers because the Job Centre and his GP considered him unfit for work. By the time he won his appeal he had lost his home and of course he was never reimbursed for all of the money he should have received.
If the big multinationals were forced to employ people to do work, rather than offered slave labour, we might see a drop in the unemployment figures. Instead, they just move on from one slave to the next, with very few obtaining a job at the end of their placement, since it benefits the employer to get another work experience person in their place.
Sorry if this is partially off-topic, but there is a link between current policy on disability and the number of unemployed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:34 AM Straggler has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 394 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 10 of 300 (665228)
06-10-2012 12:37 PM


If someone is capable of filling a job requirement are they good enough to be paid?
A basic question.
If someone can fill the requirements of an unpaid job, aren't they also capable of filling the same position in a paid job.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 1:13 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 11 of 300 (665230)
06-10-2012 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by New Cat's Eye
06-10-2012 11:28 AM


So - Does unpaid work have any economic value.....?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-10-2012 11:28 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by New Cat's Eye, posted 06-10-2012 1:46 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 12 of 300 (665232)
06-10-2012 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by jar
06-10-2012 12:37 PM


Re: If someone is capable of filling a job requirement are they good enough to be paid?
jar writes:
If someone can fill the requirements of an unpaid job, aren't they also capable of filling the same position in a paid job.
A good question.
Further - If that position is being filled by someone capable of filling that position but for free are they doing the equally capable person who requires payment out of a job?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by jar, posted 06-10-2012 12:37 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Rahvin, posted 06-10-2012 1:20 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Rahvin
Member
Posts: 4032
Joined: 07-01-2005
Member Rating: 9.2


Message 13 of 300 (665233)
06-10-2012 1:20 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Straggler
06-10-2012 1:13 PM


Re: If someone is capable of filling a job requirement are they good enough to be paid?
How good are the government benefits? Are the unpaid workers able to afford housing, food, and clothing of livable standard?
Is the unpaid work compulsory?
Gaining experience is great, but everyone still needs to be able to afford a place to live, food, and clothing at an absolute minimum. And if the work is compulsory...it stinks of an attempt to create a "slave" class.
But if the work is voluntary as a means to gain experience, and the social safety net is sufficient to guarantee the unpaid workers livable conditions, then my only concern would be whether unpaid positions would be costing existing paid jobs.
The difference I suppose could be rapped up as whether the policy is part of a program to legitimately provide the means to allow the unemployed to improve their lives (with real, measured success), or whether the policy exists solely to prey upon their misfortune and desperation.

The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion (either as being the received opinion or as being agreeable to itself) draws all things else to support and agree with it.
- Francis Bacon
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
A world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But, on the other hand, in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. — Albert Camus
"...the pious hope that by combining numerous little turds of
variously tainted data, one can obtain a valuable result; but in fact, the
outcome is merely a larger than average pile of shit." Barash, David 1995.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 1:13 PM Straggler has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 300 (665235)
06-10-2012 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Straggler
06-10-2012 1:11 PM


So - Does unpaid work have any economic value.....?
Sure: Deduct the labor cost from the manufacturing side and soak it up in an increased margin, and you could easily calculate how much economic value unpaid work adds to your widget.
Utilize the reduced cost to reduce the selling price and your widget becomes a better "value" in the economy, but that's not "economic value".
Redirect the savings from labor into R&D and invent a better widget thereby adding "value" to the economy (and benefit society as a whole), but that's not what "econimc value" means either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 1:11 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 15 of 300 (665243)
06-10-2012 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Straggler
06-10-2012 10:34 AM


That's funny, I was just thinking: hey, you know what needs re-inventing? Slavery.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Straggler, posted 06-10-2012 10:34 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024