Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 114 (8733 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-26-2017 8:48 PM
407 online now:
DrJones*, frako, jar, ThinAirDesigns (4 members, 403 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: timtak
Post Volume:
Total: 801,992 Year: 6,598/21,208 Month: 2,359/2,634 Week: 22/525 Day: 22/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12345
6
Author Topic:   the old improbable probability problem
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 1496 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 76 of 76 (665384)
06-12-2012 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by dwise1
06-12-2012 3:26 PM


Re: probabiity problems
This card talk made me think of blackjack.

quote:
You can get a blackjack in a single deck game one for every 20.72 hands dealt. A double deck will give you a blackjack for every one in every 20.93 hands. A four-deck game gives one for every 21.02 hands. And the numbers go up as you increase the number of decks.

http://www.21blackjackrules.net/single-deck-vs.html

I think that we're talking about using each of those billion decks of cards to deal a billion hands and the probability that at least one of those billion hands being a royal flush.

Multiple decks in your scenario would be to your advantage, you probably couldn't loose with numbers that large.

I thought the same as you though, that depending on how you deal it, then it could go either way.


A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
― Edward R. Murrow

"You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture. Just get people to stop reading them" - Ray Bradbury


This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by dwise1, posted 06-12-2012 3:26 PM dwise1 has not yet responded

    
Prev12345
6
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017