Are Uranium Halos the best evidence of (a) an old earth AND (b) constant physics?

Change leaves evidence.It really is that simple.What you need now is to present the evidence that all others can examine that supports the changes you claim to have happened.Where is the evidence that mass changed?Where is the evidence that the speed of light changed?Where is the evidence that Gravity changed?Where is the evidence that the basic forces changed?Show us the evidence that the Uranium Halos found at the Oklo reactor were not created 1.7 Billion years ago?Edited by jar, : fix subtitle

Those are simply assertions and not evidence.What missing mass?What missing energy?What quantum redshift?And how would anyone of those be evidence of the changes you allege happened?How could they explain the existence of the 1.7 Billion year record of mass and energy being the same as today found in the halos from the Oklo reactor?