Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What Properties Might Light of Millennia Past Have that Today's Doesn't?
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3994 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 167 of 170 (675380)
10-10-2012 6:52 PM


Relevance of the alleged bunk to the history of light.
The issue of bang is highly relevant so there is no digression. If the concept of bang is accepted at face value then the bang is the ultimate source of all light in the single common for all the existence past. A single location for the origin of light. No way to compare and verify its properties therefore we are forever in the dark unable to answer the question in the OP. Whereas what I was proposing in accordance with relativity of simultaneity was that light comes here from multiple pasts and countless locations and directions and the properties of light coming from one location can be easily verified by and compared to the same properties of radiation signals arriving from all other directions and locations in the cosmos.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.
Edited by Alfred Maddenstein, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-10-2012 7:05 PM Alfred Maddenstein has replied

  
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3994 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 169 of 170 (675384)
10-10-2012 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by Dr Adequate
10-10-2012 7:05 PM


Re: Relevance of the alleged bunk to the history of light.
No, so called CMB radiation would be no exception. When I say light I do not mean only the visible range of radiation signals. I mean any radiation. So that radiation of that wavelength would be coming from different pasts and locations just like any other. The Earth is then its source too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-10-2012 7:05 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024