Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The SEVEN "DAYS" WERE GEOLOGICAL ERAS
foreveryoung
Member (Idle past 603 days)
Posts: 921
Joined: 12-26-2011


(2)
Message 211 of 310 (683055)
12-06-2012 10:05 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by Coyote
12-06-2012 9:16 PM


Re: Refrence to Hybridization of Erectus
What makes you think he even reads the literature, much less understand it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by Coyote, posted 12-06-2012 9:16 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-06-2012 11:07 PM foreveryoung has seen this message but not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 212 of 310 (683057)
12-06-2012 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 211 by foreveryoung
12-06-2012 10:05 PM


Re: Refrence to Hybridization of Erectus
What makes you think he even reads the literature, much less understand it?
He's familiar with the details enough to be enthralled with it... to the point of desperation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 211 by foreveryoung, posted 12-06-2012 10:05 PM foreveryoung has seen this message but not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3512 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 213 of 310 (683065)
12-07-2012 6:17 AM
Reply to: Message 202 by kofh2u
12-06-2012 5:52 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
That's not what the bible says.
Water is water, not molten lava.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by kofh2u, posted 12-06-2012 5:52 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3512 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(1)
Message 214 of 310 (683066)
12-07-2012 6:22 AM
Reply to: Message 210 by New Cat's Eye
12-06-2012 9:50 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
Pangea isn't even the first of several supercontinents.
And the bible says "let the waters be gathered into one place and let the dry land appear."
Dry land already existed at the time Pangea converged.
All the water gathering together is not all the land gathering together.
Besides, you already said that it wasn't water, but a "molten accretion disk."
Whatever you have to say to make your bunk theory work, eh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 210 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-06-2012 9:50 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 215 of 310 (683081)
12-07-2012 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by Theodoric
12-06-2012 7:20 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
Even a few more continents and the water could still be in one place.
Of course each body of water in itself could be understood to be in one place.
lol.
To comprehend what the Bible writers is saying, tho, we must read the whole context of the verse where it starts by saying, "Let the waters under the heaven be gathered"... so the plural reference to waters and the command to gather THEM into one place supports the interpretation which tells us that these ancients knew of the tectonic cycle that began with Rodinia.
NOT only is the Bible correct, then, about something so far out of the realm if human knowledge back in 3362AD, but this is said to happen on "the Archean evening and the Proterozoic morning of the THIRD 'day'".
EXACTLY when the first of the cycles began with the formation of Rodinia:
Neo-archean evening of the Archaean Era-
and the Paleo-proterozoic morning of the Proterozoic Era/ = Third Day
WHAT A DIRECT AND CLEAR MATTER OF SCIENCE SUPPORTING THE BIBLE... wow for Christians and woe for you guys.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by Theodoric, posted 12-06-2012 7:20 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 216 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-07-2012 11:19 AM kofh2u has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 216 of 310 (683085)
12-07-2012 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by kofh2u
12-07-2012 11:03 AM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
To comprehend what the Bible writers is saying, tho, we must read the whole context of the verse where it starts by saying, "Let the waters under the heaven be gathered"... so the plural reference to waters and the command to gather THEM into one place supports the interpretation which tells us that these ancients knew of the tectonic cycle that began with Rodinia.
Actually, the Hebrews envisioned a flat disc shape earth that was floating on the waters. They thought it looked something like this:

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 11:03 AM kofh2u has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 8:12 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 217 of 310 (683135)
12-07-2012 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 216 by New Cat's Eye
12-07-2012 11:19 AM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
Of course.
Whereas that recent sketch of what medieval Jews thought about the universe is pretty much the same as christians believed until this Age, it is just evidence of the medieval ignorance that prevented factual interpretations of Genesis.
The religious people through out the ages did not have enough information about the facts which the Bible laid out for us today, when in the end times the Book could be opened and read in the way I am demonstrating.
\[B\]This is why stories like Noah's Ark and the Flood had to be written in a way that contained enough information so we could piece together what they were really about.
Yet writtem cleverly enough so those people could accept the story in a way that fit into their own educational paradigms of their times.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 216 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-07-2012 11:19 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by Eli, posted 12-07-2012 8:45 PM kofh2u has not replied
 Message 296 by New Cat's Eye, posted 12-10-2012 10:35 AM kofh2u has replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3512 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 218 of 310 (683138)
12-07-2012 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 217 by kofh2u
12-07-2012 8:12 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
I really hope you don't actually believe that the human anatomy falls in those dimensions.
That's one tiny head.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 8:12 PM kofh2u has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 219 by Panda, posted 12-07-2012 9:25 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 219 of 310 (683139)
12-07-2012 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 218 by Eli
12-07-2012 8:45 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
Eli writes:
I really hope you don't actually believe that the human anatomy falls in those dimensions.
That's one tiny head.
Kofh2u has already been told that the proportions are completely wrong.
But, as usual, he chose to ignore that information and instead re-posted the same stupid diagram.
It can be checked on any biology website, or just type 'spine' into google image search:
He appears immune to both learning and reality.

"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane

This message is a reply to:
 Message 218 by Eli, posted 12-07-2012 8:45 PM Eli has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 220 by jar, posted 12-07-2012 9:33 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 414 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


(2)
Message 220 of 310 (683140)
12-07-2012 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 219 by Panda
12-07-2012 9:25 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
But wait...there's more...
If you look right now you will see that there are "7" cervical vertebrae and "12" thoracic vertebrae which signify the days and months and if you add those two facts together and subtract the "5" lumbar vertebrae you end up with 14 which is 7 + 7.
Operators are standing by so call NOW!
Edited by jar, : No reason given.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 219 by Panda, posted 12-07-2012 9:25 PM Panda has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 221 by Eli, posted 12-07-2012 9:37 PM jar has not replied
 Message 222 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 10:39 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3512 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 221 of 310 (683141)
12-07-2012 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 220 by jar
12-07-2012 9:33 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
the facts of life....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by jar, posted 12-07-2012 9:33 PM jar has not replied

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 3840 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 222 of 310 (683144)
12-07-2012 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 220 by jar
12-07-2012 9:33 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
If you look right now you will see that there are "7" cervical vertebrae and "12" thoracic vertebrae ...
... and if you add the fused tail bone vertebra to the "5" lumbar vertebrae you end up with 14 which is 7 + 7.
Actually, I will bring this all up in regard to the Urim and Thumimm, Ex 28:30, when I discuss the Pattern of the Temple and how its geometry models the way out brain casts a fixed pattern to the organization of data it senses,... from the seven senses coming, into the 12 Cortex Functional Areas of the Brain, via the 12 pairs of Cranial Nerves.
So on and so on....
Edited by kofh2u, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by jar, posted 12-07-2012 9:33 PM jar has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Eli, posted 12-07-2012 10:42 PM kofh2u has not replied
 Message 224 by Coyote, posted 12-07-2012 11:52 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 3512 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 223 of 310 (683145)
12-07-2012 10:42 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by kofh2u
12-07-2012 10:39 PM


Re: My Thread on the Science of Genesis
You are fucking bonkers, guy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 10:39 PM kofh2u has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2126 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(4)
Message 224 of 310 (683149)
12-07-2012 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by kofh2u
12-07-2012 10:39 PM


Poe's Law?
The more I read of your posts, the more I think Poe's Law might apply:
Poe's law states:
Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing.
Poe's law - Wikipedia
Your posts are so far detached from reality that it is difficult for me to believe that they are serious, rather than someone pulling our collective legs and just to see how we will react.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by kofh2u, posted 12-07-2012 10:39 PM kofh2u has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 225 by Tangle, posted 12-08-2012 3:45 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9504
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.7


Message 225 of 310 (683156)
12-08-2012 3:45 AM
Reply to: Message 224 by Coyote
12-07-2012 11:52 PM


Re: Poe's Law?
Sadly, he puts too much effort into his fruit-loopery to be a Poe. He's genuinely barking.

Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android

This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by Coyote, posted 12-07-2012 11:52 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024