Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwinism Cannot Explain The Peacock
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 61 of 165 (689107)
01-28-2013 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Bolder-dash
01-27-2013 10:25 PM


You put a lot of effort into being wrong about everything, but at least you are playing to your strengths.

"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Bolder-dash, posted 01-27-2013 10:25 PM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(2)
Message 78 of 165 (689275)
01-29-2013 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Bolder-dash
01-29-2013 9:24 AM


BD writes:
Ha, yea right, some people here believe that we are descended from a chimpanzee like creature, but I sure ain't one of them! I guess you meant the other 99.86 posters here.
It is simply your abject ignorance bleeding though into the bullshit you talk.
You do not know what you are talking about and you do not know what anyone else is talking about.
Congratulations on being a genuine moron.

"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Bolder-dash, posted 01-29-2013 9:24 AM Bolder-dash has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 107 of 165 (689593)
02-01-2013 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by Arriba
02-01-2013 9:58 AM


Re: Unprovable Postulates
Arriba writes:
We got to the moon, you claim, because of science.
So, if not using science, how do you think we got to the moon then?
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by Arriba, posted 02-01-2013 9:58 AM Arriba has not replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 152 of 165 (690639)
02-14-2013 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by dwise1
02-14-2013 3:33 PM


Re: And May God Have Mercy On Your Soul
dwise1 writes:
Whether loss of that ability is deleterious depends on whether they can still get that vitamin through their diet. If they cannot, then it is deleterious; if they can, then losing the ability to synthesize vitamin C is neutral, it doesn't matter.
Why stop at guinea pigs? What about humans? We also have lost the ability to synthesize vitamin C.
As the human population has broken the 7 billion mark, I would love to see how Arriba defines 'detrimental' to also include 'exponential population growth'.
We have always eaten fruit and vegetables; more so than meat.
We rarely noticed that we could not survive without vitamin C.
The only real consequence of vitamin C dependency was that it initially limited our oceanic exploration.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

"There is no great invention, from fire to flying, which has not been hailed as an insult to some god." J. B. S. Haldane

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by dwise1, posted 02-14-2013 3:33 PM dwise1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024