Well the thread seems to have been shut down by vote of the opposing atheists whose claim is that these seven religious hypotheses are not scienc de facto they accepted the present theory of evolution.
They silenced this discussion unilaterally even though it was in a forum which examines whether Genesis makes scientific sense.
It seems easy to win such arguments when the refere is an atheist himself, but totally unfair and unsportsman-like.
The theme of this thread concerns the question of just who ought decide when one side wins and then terminate the oppositions' voice to respond in kind.
Should a christian moderator be the arbitrator on some threads and even an unbias agnostic would be better?