Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,875 Year: 4,132/9,624 Month: 1,003/974 Week: 330/286 Day: 51/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why dont creationists accept that australopithecus where bipedal
CoolBeans
Member (Idle past 3642 days)
Posts: 196
From: Honduras
Joined: 02-11-2013


Message 1 of 2 (692445)
03-03-2013 11:52 AM


Could it be than if said species was bipedal then it could be considered an increase in information?

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 03-03-2013 5:04 PM CoolBeans has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13038
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 2 of 2 (692470)
03-03-2013 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by CoolBeans
03-03-2013 11:52 AM


One sentence is inadequate. Perhaps you can explain how you're measuring the genetic information of extinct genomes?

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CoolBeans, posted 03-03-2013 11:52 AM CoolBeans has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024