That doesn't answer how the labels were derived or by what authority.
You also purposely confuse the issue by pairing up your doctored images that you created and that you have no scientific basis for with the book that you post the cover of.
Those images are not in the book, yet you pair them with it as if they are, thus confusing the context of the book and being dishonest in your citation.
Your "correspondences" have already been refuted with evidence. Your claims are false. We are beyond that. You are posting these images in threads regardless of the topic and are spamming. The issue is not whether you are correct or not (which you are not) but whether or not your spam is relevant to the thread (which it is not).