Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 114 (8734 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 03-27-2017 12:19 PM
452 online now:
jar, New Cat's Eye, ooh-child, PaulK, ringo, vimesey (6 members, 446 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: timtak
Post Volume:
Total: 802,009 Year: 6,615/21,208 Month: 2,376/2,634 Week: 39/525 Day: 14/25 Hour: 1/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Kofh2u spam
Eli
Member (Idle past 843 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


(3)
Message 1 of 12 (693060)
03-10-2013 2:21 PM


Can we get this under control?

I have seen Kofh2u post these images at least a fifty times.

http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=msg&m=693052

It would be great if someone could enforce a "You already made that post in thread a, b, c, d. It has not and is still not been relevant. Suspension will result from any more postings of these images."


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 2:25 PM Eli has acknowledged this reply

  
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 1171 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 2 of 12 (693061)
03-10-2013 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Eli
03-10-2013 2:21 PM


Yeah, yeah, yeah...

If the post was to the same person, perhaps.
But when the same dumb question or load issue is raised by other peoole, spamming their own wrong stuff, they get back the same answer because that IS THE CORRECT ANSWER.

What you like is moderation that silences Free Sppecch and thereby serves your one sided indefensible crap.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 2:21 PM Eli has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM kofh2u has responded
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 4:45 PM kofh2u has responded

    
Eli
Member (Idle past 843 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 3 of 12 (693066)
03-10-2013 2:42 PM


Mod?
  
CoolBeans
Member (Idle past 966 days)
Posts: 196
From: Honduras
Joined: 02-11-2013


Message 4 of 12 (693069)
03-10-2013 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by kofh2u
03-10-2013 2:25 PM


You know I look at that picture, but I cant stop thinking. What if we find more homind fossils of our evolutionary tree? What would happen to your explanation of the evidence?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 2:25 PM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 6:25 PM CoolBeans has not yet responded
 Message 8 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 6:36 PM CoolBeans has responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12390
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0


(1)
Message 5 of 12 (693071)
03-10-2013 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by kofh2u
03-10-2013 2:25 PM


Hi Kofh2u,

I assume we're talking about this image:

I haven't discussed this with you since the The SEVEN "DAYS" WERE GEOLOGICAL ERAS thread (see Message 168 and read forward in the chain). Have you since answered those questions about how the labels on the chart were derived? You should do that before using the chart in new discussions so that it doesn't become a center of contention and cause threads to go off-topic.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 2:25 PM kofh2u has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 6:06 PM Admin has responded

    
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 1171 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 6 of 12 (693078)
03-10-2013 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Admin
03-10-2013 4:45 PM


...analogy and correspondences are derived for illustration purposes...
I did respond then and do so now.

The very purpose of the chart is to illustrate the analogy between what science says as itemized with aows and compared with the names under each entity as mentioned in Genesis.

You may not agree with the comparision and correspindences, but that is neither here or there in regard to my point.

I am certain that the athesits and anti-genesis people seek to censor and ignore these correspondences and analogies, but that is understandable since they can not otherwise dispute the Genesis may well be in agreement with science.

Please bring this answer to the attention of some impartial administrator so we can finalize the issue between yoursel and me, since I consider you bias and subjectively influenced against any point I may bring to your attention.

Thank you in advance of such courtesy.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 4:45 PM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 6:43 PM kofh2u has not yet responded
 Message 11 by Admin, posted 03-10-2013 8:12 PM kofh2u has not yet responded

    
kofh2u
Member (Idle past 1171 days)
Posts: 1162
From: phila., PA
Joined: 04-05-2004


Message 7 of 12 (693083)
03-10-2013 6:25 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by CoolBeans
03-10-2013 3:05 PM


...right now it corresponds...

You know I look at that picture, but I cant stop thinking. What if we find more homind fossils of our evolutionary tree? What would happen to your explanation of the evidence?

Right now is what matters since right now I am drawing attention to the one-to-one corresponence and the recent science publication that says the same thing.

Since you get the point, I rest my case about the legitimacy of showing the analogy with evolution of man.

See me when the sciences say there were 50 links or ten.
An analogy is very proper too, because everything Jesus ever said was in the same gendre, called parables.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM CoolBeans has not yet responded

    
Eli
Member (Idle past 843 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 8 of 12 (693086)
03-10-2013 6:36 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by CoolBeans
03-10-2013 3:05 PM


You know I look at that picture, but I cant stop thinking. What if we find more homind fossils of our evolutionary tree?

We have. We have documented over 50 distinct hominid species. Kofh2u ignores this in favor of his bias.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 3:05 PM CoolBeans has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by CoolBeans, posted 03-10-2013 6:43 PM Eli has acknowledged this reply

  
Eli
Member (Idle past 843 days)
Posts: 274
Joined: 08-24-2012


Message 9 of 12 (693088)
03-10-2013 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by kofh2u
03-10-2013 6:06 PM


Re: ...analogy and correspondences are derived for illustration purposes...
That doesn't answer how the labels were derived or by what authority.

You also purposely confuse the issue by pairing up your doctored images that you created and that you have no scientific basis for with the book that you post the cover of.

Those images are not in the book, yet you pair them with it as if they are, thus confusing the context of the book and being dishonest in your citation.

Your "correspondences" have already been refuted with evidence. Your claims are false. We are beyond that. You are posting these images in threads regardless of the topic and are spamming. The issue is not whether you are correct or not (which you are not) but whether or not your spam is relevant to the thread (which it is not).


This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 6:06 PM kofh2u has not yet responded

  
CoolBeans
Member (Idle past 966 days)
Posts: 196
From: Honduras
Joined: 02-11-2013


Message 10 of 12 (693089)
03-10-2013 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Eli
03-10-2013 6:36 PM


His interpretation goes "boink"
This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Eli, posted 03-10-2013 6:36 PM Eli has acknowledged this reply

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12390
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.0


Message 11 of 12 (693098)
03-10-2013 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by kofh2u
03-10-2013 6:06 PM


Re: ...analogy and correspondences are derived for illustration purposes...
kofh2u writes:

I did respond then...

No you did not respond then. Did you read the message chain? Start at Message 168 and read forward. I kept asking the questions, and though you responded to the messages you never answered the questions.

...and do so now.

But you didn't do so now, either. Everyone understands you're drawing an analogy between evolutionary stages and Genesis, but the correspondences you're drawing appear to be incorrect. If you're going to continue using that image then please explain how the correspondences are correct.

I will be the moderator for this issue. There will be no other. This is a fairly objective issue. Either you can answer the questions or you cannot. For example, what evidence leads you to believe that Adam was a Sahefanthropus tchadensis?


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by kofh2u, posted 03-10-2013 6:06 PM kofh2u has not yet responded

    
NoNukes
Member
Posts: 9326
From: Central NC USA
Joined: 08-13-2010
Member Rating: 2.6


Message 12 of 12 (693153)
03-11-2013 3:23 PM


...

Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.


Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison.

If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass


    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017