jar writes:
If we are smart, maybe possibly even wise though, we should look at and understand what motivated them and see if we shouldn't change our behavior.
The Meaning Of Boston: Depends On Your Angle, Literally
James Carafano of the conservative Heritage Foundation writes:
"Clearly, on almost every aspect of this, all the facts aren't in...To draw broad public policy conclusions based on this when we don't have all the facts is not the best way to serve the public interest....It's difficult to make law by anecdote... It's difficult to use one case to make a trend, or to use one case to create a trend.
quote:
We thought, however, it would be interesting to take a quick look at just what's been out there since the attack, how interest groups and partisans have attempted to use the Boston bombings to further a cause or make a political point. Here's just a flavor of what has unfolded
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg writes:
... we live in a complex world where you're going to have to have a level of security greater than you did back in the olden days, if you will. And our laws and our interpretation of the Constitution, I think, have to change.
It(these attacks/events) will help Vladimir Putin remove the last vestiges of democracy and free press from his totalitarian Russia without a peep from the U.S.
Carafano writes:
... come next week Boston will fade as a point of argument in the immigration debate, at least."Americans are not too excited about people playing politics with tragedy."
Perhaps terrorism achieves the goal of confusin political and social agendas, but it seems to me that it also unifies nationalism....something unwise for a foreign enemy to do. Unless of course the strategy is to cause us to overreact and bankrupt our system.