Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,821 Year: 3,078/9,624 Month: 923/1,588 Week: 106/223 Day: 4/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The price one pays to nowhere has increased some dollars more
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1153 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


(1)
Message 1 of 3 (701717)
06-24-2013 5:05 PM


-
Hi,
A currency number for expenses and costs required to do the work of the Sacred one was estimated into 245 dollars.
Right after having said that the estimated currency number was 245 dollars, a pastor added saying: 300 dollars does work. However, when paying the exceeding amount then a person is working to whom? On this, in order for a person not to be a slave working to spirits of men and serving them financially, the solution is pay 55 dollars more knowing that it’s much less, compared to what a person is entitled to receive if (s)he wins the case: from 5,000 to 50,000 dollars.
Would you like to query for a debate,
What about a discussion on Why not combat this Slavery in your country?
Instituted slavery occurs in congregations of people who are deprived from their Rights of equality and transparency, specifically in regards to currencies that are delivered as tithes and offerings. Instituted slavery is ruled by doctrine ( system of miserability ) which determines,
1st. Systematic transference of currencies ( that result from the payment of tithes and offerings ) from a location to another, that is not specifically authorized by the majority of the people that congregate in a respective location.
2nd. Transgression of a Constitutional right of equality and transparency.
3rd. Non-publication of financial information in the administration of currencies that are delivered as payment of tithes and offerings.
I’ll call you friends; I’ll not call you servants, because, to a slave, it’s not given to know what actions are done by those who administer over him.
When establishing the Right of Equality also for the people that congregate for reason of biblical instruction, a new Enactment of Transparency and Equality clears up that the Federal Constitution and the legal norms are found unable to give one the understanding on the differences between personal purpose and religious purpose, whenever they become fused into a religious person.
Not Being Complicit In Transgression of Rights — When this matter becomes approved by plebiscite, with simultaneous participation of the popular vote then the National Congress will not be complicit in instituted slavery any longer, clearing up these very strange things:
* non-publication of financial information, ( secret assemblies ), in the administration of currencies of tithes and offerings;
* financial privileges determined to small group or minority; systematic transference of currencies of tithes, from a location where people are congregating to another, contrary to the decision of the majority of people that are participants and members in the respective location;
* subjection imposed by statutes of unrighteous rules and doctrines that transgress the right of the people.
These strange things do not only transgress several principles but it’s also a system made to make it impossible for one to distinguish between personal purpose and religion’s purpose. And as one does not need a shepherd to take care of the sheep where there are no sheep or in case the sheep are dying because of disease or lack of food and shelter, even so those who deliver their currencies as payment of tithes and offerings also do not need to be deprived of their right of equality which is the right of participating by receiving fifty percent of the amounts paid, in case of any eventuality.
When the Right of Equality is established also for the people that congregate for biblical reason:
I — the Enactment does restore the values, it puts and end to the instituted slavery, improving life intensely for the great majority of the people that congregate;
II — it’s approved by legislators, mayors and delegates that never had the privilege of non-publication of financial information when administering the currencies that are delivered to them.
Knowing that the right to comfort in a congregation of people does not pertain solely to those that show themselves as stewards for ministration of currencies that are delivered to them and not for the purpose of those funds to become their own, similarly, there’s no reason for one to be complicit with doctrines of miserability, which are made in order for 100 % from the total of funds to be applied solely for the financial privilege of a small group or minority; as it is said: If ye have respect to persons, ye commit transgression, and are convinced of the Law as transgressors.
Parable of the Partition
50 persons had decided to work together and settle themselves to form a community. And there was among them a farmer who called them to live in his lands. The farmer said: ‘What so ever you produce, and a part of the currencies from your work, that you deliver to me, will belong to the community; And the houses you’ll build, and even the properties that I own will be in the name of the community’.
And the people delivered a part from what they produced, from what they could, to the farmer but the farmer did not give them right to partition from the currencies that would belong to the community. When someone was in a circumstance of disease or lack of food and clothes then the farmer only gave to them from what he had left over. Until the day that some men asked him: ‘Did you not write and declare that a part of the currencies from our work, which we deliver to you, would belong to the community?’ From that day on the people had right to partition in case of any eventuality.
The Right of Transparency and Equality in a congregation of people is founded in the principle of the partition: To share what we have rather than what is left over. The doctrine of instituted slavery determines, by statute or rule, the non-publication of financial information of its legal representatives (pastors, ministers, reverends and others) and secret assemblies regarding currencies that are delivered as tithes and offerings to a congregation.
A Law of Transparency and Equality is necessary to the gatherings of people that congregate for biblical reasons. Because in the moment that the currencies are delivered as payment of tithes and offerings the purpose is not that those currencies should pertain to any specific man since the people do not congregate for the purpose of serving men. The purpose is that the funds and all things that are put in the name of a congregation should pertain to the congregation as a whole and not just for the privilege of a small group or 0,3 % of people.
According to the letter of Paul to Philippians, the real church is a congregation of people. The church is not just 0,3 % or 2 % of people that gather themselves together for biblical reasons. On this, ‘Right of Equality in congregation of people’ means that everything that a congregation owns, which are put in the name of a church, does actually pertain to be shared with 51 % of people in the least.
The doctrine of instituted slavery and miserability has the habit of not sharing what is already in the vault by the method of always asking for more currencies rather than share what was already delivered to the stewards or legal representatives. In other words, the people who are the real congregation ( at least 51 % of the people ) do not have Right of equality over what is already in the vault. The currencies given to a brother or sister in case of any eventuality have been solely what is left over.
The system of miserability is a doctrinal image in the likeness of a leopard since the beast does not share any good with the people. It does not mention the currencies that were given yesterday or last month and it is always asking for more money in case of any eventuality. The pastor or legal representative of the doctrine similar to a leopard says ‘ let’s help this brother or sister ’, and it sounds like ‘doing a favor’ which means that no Right of equality is involved. To the contrary, the saying often heard is ‘nobody is forcing anyone to congregate here; therefore those who are unsatisfied are free to leave’.
However, Legislators must remind that a Constitutional Right is not just for outside of the gates. The National Congress ought to know that the Right of Equality must be accomplished and applied not only outside of the gates of a congregation.
A doctrine that acts like a leopard does not share the currencies with the participants of the real church which is formed of people. If it was acting in the likeness of a lamb then it would treat people with equality. When ascertaining that slave is who ever are found dominated by a passion or any moral force then it’s very important that the power of a precise Legislation comes to be exercised to combat against instituted slavery.
Every doctrine or religion system which determines not to share the funds, in case of any eventuality, with the people that had delivered their resources, has respect to persons. Therefore it has nothing to do with loving thy neighbor as thyself, which means: to share and divide with right of equality as quoted in Chapter Second of the Enactment that establishes the right of equality and transparency in regards to the application and transference of currency in the congregations.
Chapter 2nd — When a person had delivered as payment of tithes or offerings to a congregation of people that congregate for the reason of biblical instruction, currency that equates to an amount not less than U$ 25.00 (twenty-five) dollars whether through one or more payments, and after a time that person is found in a circumstance of disease, lack of food, clothes and shelter then that person has the right to participate in the sharing of those funds by receiving half of the amount that the same person had paid to the congregation, which will be proved by the presentation of receipt(s).
The Debate is an event of Plebiscite that places a new Law to the popular vote. People are invited to vote or suggest which option should be voted.
To vote YES is confirming that the people who congregate, whether in a distant region or populated area, have right to choose if the money will stay in the location where they congregate or if the currencies must be automatically and systematically transferred as determined in the statutes of doctrine imposed by the registration of religion or instituted slavery. When exercising the right of equality, people that congregate do vote YES for not serving men. They have dignity for choosing if the transferences of currency should be authorized or not.
To vote NO is agreeing that only the legal representative of a congregation has Right to choose which destination the money will go to. To vote NO is renouncing a Constitutional Right, giving up the Right of Equality. To give up that right is serving men.
When speaking in reference to any doctrine that is imposed by a registered statute, a person has the option of regarding those doctrines as: ‘that which is not Human nor the celestial Word either’.
For it is not the celestial word that would be imposing and determining that 100% of the currencies ( which result from the payment of tithes and offerings ) would have to be automatically and systematically transferred, from the places where people live and work, to the vault of a rich small group or minority.
People have the option of regarding those doctrines as: ‘image of that which does not act as a lamb’, or; ‘image of that which is opposite of the lamb’ whenever it is verified that a system of miserability is found in those doctrines. That system of miserability is transgression of peoples’ rights, to equality and transparency, and the habit of not sharing with the people that delivered their resources as tithes and offerings to support that same congregation.
Who ever give his breath of life to represent and personify a doctrine, comes to represent that which is not Human, something that acts in a manner that is opposite to the form of action of the lamb. The legal representative will be giving life to an image of doctrine that is similar to a leopard. As it was quoted before:
And it was given to give breath of life to the image of the beast, so that the image of the beast may speak, and cause all who do not pay reverence to the image of the beast that they may *die. [* which means, that they may be excluded from the institution; or condemned by the respective doctrine ].
"When a delivering of currency, as payment of tithes, is motivated by the meaning of the term ‘ought to do’ then it is not spontaneously given by freewill.
"When speaking about payment of tithes,
bringing up that the respective delivering of currency
is a payment that one ‘ought to do’ then the meaning of ‘giving by freewill’
has no place in it since a spontaneous action by freewill
does not depend on external causes, which are in this case,
the systematic quotation of words which convince people
that they ought to do the payment of those currencies.
-
The Constitutional Right of Equality
-
No one shall be deprived of his or her right of equality, in a congregation of people, whether for reasons of belief, religion or philosophic conviction.
-
Enactment of the Right of Transparency and Equality
-
Establishing the right of transparency in regards to the application and transference of currency in a congregation of people.
-
Chapter First . . . . . . . . . . When a monetary number is brought up by the representative of a congregation of people that congregate for reason of biblical instruction, to help cover expenses and costs of any work that is done for that same congregation and that number brought up surpasses the exact total of those respective expenses and costs then the excess amount will be deemed a beginning of transference of currency that transgresses the right of equality between:
I — the complete congregation of people;
II — the legal representative of the respective congregation.
Unique Section . . . . . . . . . . No one will be deprived of the right of equality, in a congregation of people, whether for reasons of belief or religious doctrine, specifically in regards to the application of currency, which implies that the representative of a respective congregation can not impose that a transference of currency comes to occur, from a location where people are congregating to another, whenever that transference is contrary to the decision that the people which are found congregating in that location, in number above the half, had decided.
Chapter Second . . . . . . . . . . When a person had delivered as payment of tithes or offerings to a congregation of people that congregate for the reason of biblical instruction, currency that equates to an amount not less than U$ 25.00 (twenty-five) dollars whether through one or more payments, and after a time that person is found in a circumstance of disease, lack of food, clothes and shelter then that person has the right to participate in the sharing of those funds by receiving half of the amount that the same person had paid to the congregation, which will be proved by the presentation of receipt(s).
Section 1 . . . . . . . . . . The delivering of currency as payment of tithes or offerings wherever there is a system, or doctrine, which deprives a person of the right to equality established in the Unique Section of the Chapter 1st of this Enactment, shall be considered, in legal form, a delivering of currency that is destitute of the legal significance of spontaneous transference of domain of that same currency.
( .. .. Section 2 .. .. )
Section 3 . . . . . . . . . . It shall constitute a deprivation of the right to equality that the representative of a congregation comes to deny moving out of a position to which he entitles himself to be leader, or that he brings into effect a transference, from a location where people are congregating to another, of currencies that result from the payment of tithes and offerings, when having no valid authorizations that had been separately composed, in their form of writing, by each person that form the majority, in the congregation of people from the location where they would want a transference of currency taking place or not.
Section 4 . . . . . . . . . . It constitutes infraction, subjecting the infractor to the payment of a variable fine, from U$ 5,000 (five thousand) to U$ 50,000 (fifty thousand) dollars:
I — to deprive a person of his or her right to equality as cleared up in the Unique Section of Chapter 1st, Chapter 2nd, and Session 3 of Chapter 2nd, of the present Enactment;
II — to impose an instituted slavery or to bring into effect a transference, from a location where people are congregating to another, of currencies that result from the delivering of tithes and offering, when having no valid authorizations that had been separately composed, in their form of writing, by everyone that constitute the majority, in the congregation of people from the location where they would want a transference of currency taking place or not.
( .. .. Chapters 7th, 6th, 4th and 3rd .. .. )
Chapter Fifth . . . . . . . . . . It shall constitute a deprivation of the right to equality that the representative of a congregation does influence or work up a power over anyone for reason of religious belief, in regards to the application of currency, or that he brings into effect a decision regarding monetary numbers that result from the payment of tithes and offerings, when having no previous authorizations which had been separately composed, in their form of writing, by each person that form the majority, in the congregation of people from the location where they would want a decision regarding the application of currency taking place or not.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 06-24-2013 8:13 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12998
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.3


(7)
Message 2 of 3 (701722)
06-24-2013 8:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel
06-24-2013 5:05 PM


Hi CD,
If at some point your other incoherent thread, What is the lowest multiplication rate for Humans ?, happens to lapse into lucidity, then I might consider risking the waste of my time in reviewing this thread proposal, but not until then.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 06-24-2013 5:05 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 06-25-2013 3:16 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1153 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 3 of 3 (701747)
06-25-2013 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
06-24-2013 8:13 PM


-
Hi Admin,
The rough translation of Enactment of the Right to Transparency and Equality is not the final version in English.
The reason for the OP is that perhaps some people here might consider that it is not a waste of time to combat that Slavery in your country.
For more info, or if some of you would want to help to improve the edition and translation of the Enactment, send an email to sealedwithin -- @ -- gmail.com
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 06-24-2013 8:13 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024