If people "deserve" certain rights but they aren't granted untill a century later, that suggests that the convenience of the granters had higher priority than the "need" of the grantees
In the case of things like the right to drink from a water fountain or ride in the front of a bus, sure. But neither of those is inherent to living things.
Nobody
deserves rights, especially not freedom. It is already an inherent quality of living things to be free. What
can happen is someone infringes on those rights, with laws and sticks and hoses.
It makes no sense to say "You're not free because we haven't given you that right." That is not a right someone can give you. You are a free being, who may have been born in a time and place where there were laws and governing bodies that infringed on those rights.
You can't speak up until you have the right to speak up.
That's ridiculous. Anyone can speak up whenever they please. Freewill isn't something that is
given.
First, some white people decided that black people "should" have rights - but nothing was actually done about it until it became convenient for a significant number of white people.
Black people had all the rights to live freely that every living thing has. Unfortunately, some were born in a time and place where the powers that be infringed on those rights.
- Oni