|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,765 Year: 4,022/9,624 Month: 893/974 Week: 220/286 Day: 27/109 Hour: 0/3 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Flat Earth Society | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2503 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
If anyone thinks some of our members here are amongst the most adept in the world at ignoring evidence that's staring them in the face, try this lot:
Flat earth society forum. Try the "Flat Earth Debate" section, and don't forget to read the FAQs. Does anyone think they can actually prove that the earth is spherical? (Don't forget, your sources of information could all be part of a grand conspiracy).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member (Idle past 331 days) Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
So these are not just some Poe's like i once uppon a time thought creationist where.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2503 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
I think some of them are serious, yes. Of course, the first question in the FAQs is the one I'd expect most people to ask: "Is this site a joke?"
It's a disc we live on apparently, by the way, so the concept doesn't seem to have to do with the biblical "four corners of the earth".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6410 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.3 |
I always assumed that the Flat Earth Society was people having fun (tongue in cheek style). And then there's the Tiddlywinks club and the Duodecimal society. Oh, don't forget the Philadephia Procrastinators -- I'm not sure if you can call them a club, because they have not yet gotten around to naming themselves.
Does anyone think they can actually prove that the earth is spherical?
Well, of course it is not spherical. Topologically, it is a sphere with handles. And every time a new clover-leaf highway interchange is built, we add more handles. There are also natural handles (natural bridges, caves with multiple openings). Geometrically, it is not a sphere -- there are too many hills and valleys for that.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 438 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Of course, a lot of people do believe in a(n approximately) spherical earth for poor reasons. My father used to cite the fact that ships disappear over the horizon a little bit at a time - which indicates curvature but not necesarily a complete sphere.
There is no magic bullet that definitively proves a spherical earth; it's an accumulation of little bits of evidence. Like evolution, it's easy to argue against individual points but it's unreasonable to disregard the whole weight of evidence at once.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member
|
Does anyone think they can actually prove that the earth is spherical? I wonder if Richard Branson could even convince them: Home | Virgin Galactic
and don't forget to read the FAQs They mention that the North Pole is the center of the disc and at the outer edge is an ice wall that corresponds to Antarctica. If they really cared to find out, they could measure the length of the circumference of Antarctica and figure out that its way to small to be the outer edge of the disc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9509 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
I still think it's mostly a Poe.
But I do find it really interesting how the likes of Mindspawn and Faith can continually create alternative realities to fit their beliefs then justify them with fragments of disjointed facts, science and invention. Simultaneously being both rational and hopelessly irrational. These people aren't stupid - which you'd expect from people with such screwed up ideas - in fact they are pretty damn smart. Deluded isn't really a big enough word for what they are. Not so long ago I had a 3 year debate with a guy that didn't believe in evolution. He had a PhD in astro physics, but he was totally irrational when it came to evolution. He eventually accepted it, but it wasn't as a result of the argument, it was because he visited Cambridge University (UK) and got to speak to a few high end biologists that were also Christians. They explained that his position was scientifically untenable but also that it wasn't a problem for his other beliefs. He wasn't persuaded by argument, he was persuaded by peer pressure. An interesting phenomenon.Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
nwr Member Posts: 6410 From: Geneva, Illinois Joined: Member Rating: 5.3
|
He wasn't persuaded by argument, he was persuaded by peer pressure. An interesting phenomenon.
It was peer pressure that persuaded then to oppose evolution. So it is no surprise that peer pressure can also work the other way.Fundamentalism - the anti-American, anti-Christian branch of American Christianity
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1370 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
quote: this seems like a claim with easily tested prediction: circumnavigation near the antarctic should be significantly longer than circumnavigation near the arctic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2503 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
arachnophilia writes: near the antarctic should be significantly longer than circumnavigation near the arctic. But you would be measuring the times of voyages making "round earth" assumptions. For example, the standard round earth view of the sun is completely different from the flat earth model, so it cannot be used as a basis for any units of time. And if human devices like clocks (based on R.E. solar assumptions anyway) appear to show a short time for a voyage close to the ice wall, this could be accounted for by the rim-proximity time warp hypothesis, which is part of the model of some flat earthers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member (Idle past 374 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: |
Does anyone think they can actually prove that the earth is spherical? I don't see how we could have day and night at the same time on the same side of a disc. Their spotlight explanation falls a little flat.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2503 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
ProtoTypical writes: I don't see how we could have day and night at the same time on the same side of a disc. Their spotlight explanation falls a little flat. Something in me hopes the pun was intended. But seriously, optical illusions have to be taken into account, as they are demonstrably common. Here's a discussion on apparent sunrise and sunset you might enjoy.
Sunrise/sunset Third post:
quote: There you have it. Prove him wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
arachnophilia writes:
But you would be measuring the times of voyages making "round earth" assumptions. near the antarctic should be significantly longer than circumnavigation near the arctic. You could use stakes as markers to determine when you went around once and then figure up the distance you traveled (maybe with a really long wire) and see that its way too short to be the outer edge of the disc.
the rim-proximity time warp hypothesis Heh, they should have a rim-proximity space warp hypothesis where as you approach the outer edge of the disc, space is warped back around towards itself to a centralized point directly underneath the north pole. Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bluegenes Member (Idle past 2503 days) Posts: 3119 From: U.K. Joined: |
C.S. writes: You could use stakes as markers to determine when you went around once and then figure up the distance you traveled (maybe with a really long wire) and see that its way too short to be the outer edge of the disc. It's often been noted by the society that round earthers will suggest what they think would be experiments which would falsify a flat earth, but that they seem to lack the confidence to actually go out and do them.
Heh, they should have a rim-proximity space warp hypothesis where as you approach the outer edge of the disc, space is warped back around towards itself to a centralized point directly underneath the north pole. We do. We also have a "staked wire distortion hypothesis" which would render your suggested experiment above futile. Along with all that, we have a healthy "the burden of proof is on you" attitude*, based on the obvious point that the earth being flat is the intuitive default position (otherwise we would fall off).
*Sometimes known colloquially as "the mindspawn stance".
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Heh, they should have a rim-proximity space warp hypothesis where as you approach the outer edge of the disc, space is warped back around towards itself to a centralized point directly underneath the north pole. We do. Nice. So its flat, its just that everything is distorted to make it look like a sphere. Truly inarguable.
We also have a "staked wire distortion hypothesis" which would render your suggested experiment above futile. Do you have a link to that hypothesis? I couldn't find it through google.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024