Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 40/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Which animals would populate the earth if the ark was real?
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


(1)
Message 516 of 991 (706408)
09-11-2013 8:01 AM
Reply to: Message 509 by mindspawn
09-11-2013 5:44 AM


Re: If the ARK was real here is what we must see.
Mammals were a lot smaller then
Another assertion. Care to provide any backing for this?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 509 by mindspawn, posted 09-11-2013 5:44 AM mindspawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 517 by Tangle, posted 09-11-2013 8:20 AM Theodoric has not replied
 Message 519 by mindspawn, posted 09-11-2013 10:23 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 879 of 991 (709192)
10-22-2013 10:39 AM
Reply to: Message 875 by mindspawn
10-22-2013 8:48 AM


Re: Uniformity assumptions...
Please splain how you reconcile these two contradictory ideas that are in the consecutive
sentences.
I'm not a YEC, and have no problem with an old earth.
Its more the 0- 600 million ya period that I dispute, I believe it represents a 0-6500 ya period.
Are you saying that what science says was a 650 million year period was actually a 6500 year period?
An how long since and of this period till the present time?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 875 by mindspawn, posted 10-22-2013 8:48 AM mindspawn has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9197
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 928 of 991 (709361)
10-25-2013 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 914 by Dr Adequate
10-24-2013 10:10 PM


who managed to produce a reasoned argument for why the Mississippi River couldn't possibly have eroded the Grand Canyon.
Did good ole Buz actually make that argument?

Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 914 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-24-2013 10:10 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024