Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The smoldering of EVC
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 90 of 168 (715291)
01-03-2014 6:37 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by roxrkool
01-02-2014 10:14 PM


Re: The smoldering of EvC
Water softeners use salt. Probably most people use sodium chloride (table salt), but those wishing to be more environmentally friendly use potassium chloride (costs 5x more).
Potassium is an important nutrient for athletic performance, which is why some athletes will consume a banana or two (high in potassium) during activity. Potassium chloride can be consumed directly. Instead of taking a potassium supplement before athletic activity, just add a bit from your water softener to your water bottle.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by roxrkool, posted 01-02-2014 10:14 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Coragyps, posted 01-03-2014 9:03 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied
 Message 94 by roxrkool, posted 01-03-2014 10:29 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


(1)
Message 107 of 168 (715402)
01-05-2014 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by Faith
01-05-2014 7:01 AM


Re: The Unwitnessed / Prehistoric Past
Hi Faith,
As I proposed to Marc, if there's really to be a discussion between the two sides of the nature of scientific evidence, then someone should propose a new thread. Here in this thread I'll just say that no one's misreading what you write, your claim that the "UNWITNESSED / PREHISTORIC PAST" somehow make it indeciperable is just a bald declaration, and that in your example the people you're calling witnesses are not witnesses but are just people who might be called to testify at a trial.
Continuing with the example of the forensics expert, if you decide to propose a new thread then you must focus on the difference between a forensics expert analyzing clues from last week and a geologist analyzing clues from past geologic eras.
Faith writes:
Sigh. Pass the Mylanta please.
Trust me when I say that there's a lot less stress when the evidence is on your side. You've set yourself a very heavy task when you have to make stuff up while hiding the fact it's made up, and then convince other people it's real in opposition to all evidence. As you've conceded, you can't even convince your own people. Seems like first convincing your own people would be a natural starting point.
--Percy
Edited by Percy, : Grammar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 7:01 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 1:58 PM Percy has replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 109 of 168 (715404)
01-05-2014 9:03 AM
Reply to: Message 108 by JonF
01-05-2014 8:59 AM


Re: The Unwitnessed / Prehistoric Past
JonF writes:
Whoops, now you're equivocating. You just said that a witness need not be an observer. Now you are denying your earlier definition. Make up your mind.
Yeah, I hit the same problem. I decided not to comment and just focused on the part where she considered witnesses to be people.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 108 by JonF, posted 01-05-2014 8:59 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by JonF, posted 01-05-2014 10:12 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 116 of 168 (715436)
01-05-2014 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Faith
01-05-2014 1:58 PM


Re: The Unwitnessed / Prehistoric Past
Hi Faith,
This is a Coffee House thread, and as Jon and I tried to make clear to you, it's not easy to tell when you're talking about witnesses who are people versus witnesses that are evidence. Instead of us all trying to work that out here, why don't you clarify what you mean as part of a topic proposal over at Proposed New Topics.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 1:58 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Faith, posted 01-05-2014 2:18 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22480
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 143 of 168 (716159)
01-12-2014 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by Modulous
01-12-2014 6:07 PM


Hi Modulous,
It's on the todo list. I have a little help now, but I think things are still going to be very slow.
--Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Modulous, posted 01-12-2014 6:07 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by Phat, posted 11-21-2017 4:31 PM Percy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024