Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 0/64 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No genetic bottleneck proves no global flood
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17825
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.2


(2)
Message 113 of 140 (721213)
03-05-2014 7:37 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Faith
03-05-2014 7:15 AM


Re: Neutral, deleterious or beneficial
Since you said:
Well, this is what I've gleaned from many online presumably science-based discussions of the information. THEY say this, I get it from THEM. The vast majority are neutral, many others are deleterious
it would follow that the relevant meaning would be the one used by "THEM", which would be the standard definition, not your idea of what "THEY" meant. It seems that in reality you are the one trying to change meanings by changing definitions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Faith, posted 03-05-2014 7:15 AM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024