There are several vital issues I have now put into my blog, concerning the definitions of evolution, what evidence is, and whether I think Creationism is science.
This is NOT a return to futile debate, I am still lurking, this is a link for readers only.
It should be noted that the topics I have written are very short, and I do not waste any time blabbing, every word leads to the point I am making, and the topics are very short, I would apreciate the honest folk having a look.
"What is Design?" is a brief, simplistic description of design with many meaty parts left out, such as the updated theorems of information that include code, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and apobetics, rather than the previously known statistical theory. (See Dr Werner Gitt's book, "In the beginning was Information").
(Hello and goodbye, I am not stopping by to respond to posts).
Why post if you do not want any debate? Is this drive by proselytization? As far as I am concerned this is nothing more than spamming and I hope that that is the view that Percy and the admins take. If you are not willing to debate what you say(on your website), then I dont think the link should even be posted here. I for one won't bother even looking at your site if you are not willing to back anything up with evidence or argument.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
Mike, its been awhile! I will check out your blog, but urge you to discuss your beliefs with us. You can start with me, since you know I am a believer, although probably more liberal than you are comfortable with.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.
When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, it means just what I choose it to meannothing more nor less.
It should be noted that I intend, and have already, to an extent, resolved to answer the difficuilt questions that are asked of believers. The blog is continually updated.
I still have a thirst to learn and write. I am not a spammer, I am putting effort in to create clear, coherent, topics that require deep thought for the satisfaction of readers at EvC and other places, pertaining directly to the EvC debate.
I am not an enemy of atheists or evolutionists, and believe they have the right to their views, and the freedom to express and expound them, and further them, and I am doing my best to make my views worthy of consideration.
How could you do this to me. I am a forever broken individual!
I irrefutably, immutably disagree! ERGO, I shall call you "Sir Spamalot" from now on, given you have besmirched thine great omni-Baramin we call mike!
Furthermore. may I draw your attention to my blog, which would now represent a small book, I imagine. Here are two worthily immutable entries that evolutionists will HATE.
We know the score, that we are forever diametrically opposed, and of course you will know, there is never a chance of me denying the creation I see everyday before me, even though it was predicted that I would and should and indeed inevitably, would become evolutionist. Yet my mind, I find, gets sharper, and the sharper it gets, the more I become convinced of an unbelievably wonderful creation, more complicated than I ever thought possible. The increase in knowledge has not led to my inevitable conversion, and all manner of personal retorts will now ensue, as to why that is the case, I suppose. But don't do it here, as I am just posting the link for readers and neutralites.
I shall next post at EvC in 2015, I am sure you can't wait.
™ Version 4.2
(1)