Why is evolution so controversial?

Publish your research and convince all those tens of thousands of profesional geologists of that as they find the geological time scale very, very helpful. And all the Geology Departments in every University in the world. And all those mining companies.Just be aware; you might be laughed at in your face, by every single one of them.

There are lots of reasons for deposition to stop. For example, ever heard of erosion?You should read up on what the geological time sheet is and read up on what a geological column is before you keep on making such a fool of yourself.Also do some studies on the Kalahari Group, the Algoa Group, the Sandveld Group and the Maputaland Group to name but a few. The geological time table is not a theory.Let me help you a little bit: The geologic time sheet represents units of time. Not of rocks.Edited by Pressie, : Added a sentence and spelling

Damnn that crazy GPS nonsense right those silly scientists measured the rise of the new Zealand Alps, to be 5 millimetres a year. Their gps must be faulty and even if its not this clearly shows the grand canyon couldn't have rose up that high in 6000 years and we all know the earth is 6000 years old. Silly scientists.Measurement of Mountains' Rise is a First | Live Science

Sure they do you are just thinking on a 6000 year time-scale, while the actual time-scale is a bit bigger, so they have way much more time to form.

Well one giant plate pushes under the other one when they collide so the one on the bottom gets pushed down the other one up. And yes they are still going the plates move a few centimetres a year not much on a 6000 year time-scale but that time-scale is silly anyway. But on the real time-scale it makes perfect sense.

It would really be very interesting to see how old Faith explains all that 'sand' (up to 200m thick covering 2.5 million square kilometers) in the Kalahari Basin by claiming some magic fluddy.For those who don’t know (I guess virtually everyone on this forum; the Kalahari Group found in the Kalahari Basin started being deposited in the late Cretaceous).Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

um the Kalahari Basin link goes to some Nobel prize winning protocell Edited by frako, : No reason given.

And the Himalayas. Mount Everest and K2 have a family feud to see who can be he highest mountain. Sometimes one is in front; some years the other is in front. On average they go around 5mm higher. Every year. Fossils and all. Both decided to say: stuff erosion!Hopefully none of them has a gun to mow down the other one.

Thanks. I'll try to change it to the right one. Hopefully it links to the intended document now.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

This has been explained to you before in many other threads. The oldest seafloor in the world is perhaps 200 million years old. Most seafloor is less than 100 million years old. Seafloor is produced at oceanic ridges where it travels conveyor like to subduction zones where it descends into the Earth and is melted and consumed in the mantle. Only occasionally does seafloor become continent and so is preserved. Most seafloor that has ever existed on Earth is long gone now, disappeared into subduction zones.--Percy

This is as inexplicably nonsensical as something Faith would say.--PercyEdited by Percy, : Fix attribution.

Lying again. The claim was layers, not rocks. I looked at that search and count five on the first page that discuss layers on the sea floor, including at least one sonar image that clearly shows layers: And if you go to the image search version , you can easily see: Remember, it's layers, not rocks. And those layers exist. Exactly how to those layers fail to resemble the geologic column? I looked at that search... it's an image search, and you missed this one:

quote:

---

This image sequence shows the cross-section of a core drilled in the Mediterranean Sea. Sediment layers can be formed from dust, volcanic ash, river sediments, underwater mudslides, plant and animal skeletons, precipitated calcium carbonate, or salts left behind by an evaporated sea. (Image courtesy Integrated Ocean Drilling Program)

---

Layers out the wazoo.And you missed: And: (from a lake)And: And:

quote:

---

Sediment and rock cores recovered by drilling the seafloor provide access to a vast repository of geological and environmental information on Earth's history. The core shown above, collected 300 miles off the northeast Florida coast, reveals an amazingly detailed record of a meteorite impact event in the Caribbean 65 million years ago. This event is believed to have caused mass extinction, perhaps as much as 70 percent of all species, including the dinosaurs. The dark layer contains the debris from the impact. The rust colored layer represents the debris from the vaporized meteorite. The graded gray core material overlying the rust layer shows the gradual repopulating of the ocean with microorganisms. The approximately 40 cm of core material was collected at a water depth of about 2600 meters, 110 meters below the seafloor.

---

Layers, Faithie-poo.

Must be someone just as ignorant as you.. The ocean floors are much younger than the Earth. Plate Tectonics. The Atlantic is only around 130 million years old.

You produced links and claimed that they show you are correct. I looked at the links and they prove you wrong. See above, from cursory inspection of your links (which you obviously did not do). Exactly what evidence would you expect to find if fossils werr being formed? Something like Whale Fall?

Not so.I imagine Taq is saying that until there is evidence to support the hypothesis it will not be accepted.