A Christian takes on ID

What this article once again shows is the utter emptiness of ID and the incredible deceitfulness of its proponents. What really made my blood boil was this:

quote:

---

I mentioned in the debate that I thought this difficultyacknowledged as it was by other ID theoristswas the deepest and most interesting challenge facing ID. But Meyer assured me that this is no longer an issue and that they now had a theory, although whatever it is appears to remain a well-kept secret. I objected that, as a physicist with a Ph.D who had studied some real theoriesquantum mechanics, classical mechanics, electromagnetismID did not remotely resemble any other theory in the natural sciences and was thus hard to see how it might work. The response was that ID was under no obligation to satisfy the expectations of the scientific community for what a theory should look like.

---

There is not an ounce of honesty or integrity in IDiots - they are on a mission to have their beliefs spread and they do not care about the collateral damage.

What a lovely cop-out. As long as the ID-folks get to define the terminology their way...
Horoscopes are more scientific than ID.