Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,386 Year: 3,643/9,624 Month: 514/974 Week: 127/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fossil Record Mistakes and Why They Don't Hurt Evolution
dwise1
Member
Posts: 5946
Joined: 05-02-2006
Member Rating: 5.5


Message 6 of 13 (729532)
06-13-2014 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by herebedragons
06-13-2014 7:52 AM


I had encountered that creationist whale fossil claim back around 1990. They provided a fair amount of detail and cited only one source from a trade journal, "Industrial Chemist". I found that source at a local university and it said nothing but that an entire whale fossil had been found near Lompoc and that it was in a layer of diatomaceous earth. Maybe there was mention of that layer being tilted, but certainly nothing about the fossil being vertically placed; I am remembering back about 24 years. Apparently the creationist source had been extremely inventive in creating this claim ex nihilo.
I got an update to that story through talkorigins.org (A Whale of a Tale). That article also has a bibliography.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by herebedragons, posted 06-13-2014 7:52 AM herebedragons has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by TryingToBeLogical, posted 06-13-2014 10:56 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024