Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is it? (Fossils, rocks and geology)
ramoss
Member (Idle past 640 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 1 of 7 (729672)
06-16-2014 10:32 PM


I recently went to a bunch of yard sales, and I picked up someone's rock collection. Their hobby was going all over the U.S. and picking up interesting things. Since his kids were going back to utah the next morning, they didn't want to haul around a bunch of rocks.
Can someone tell me what some of these are?
For example, what kind of tooth is this?
And this looks like a paw print.. It is, or is it just a random set of depressions that evoke invalid conclusions?
and what kind of nut would this possibly be (it's rock, but looks similar to a shag bark hickory nut)

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-16-2014 11:16 PM ramoss has replied
 Message 4 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-16-2014 11:47 PM ramoss has replied

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 2 of 7 (729674)
06-16-2014 11:16 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ramoss
06-16-2014 10:32 PM


A belemnite, a ?, and a barnacle
1 is not a tooth. I think it is a belemnite shell. Correction - Not a shell, but actually an internal hard part called a "guard".
Don't know about 2.
3 looks like a barnacle shell to me.
Moose
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Correction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ramoss, posted 06-16-2014 10:32 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by ramoss, posted 06-16-2014 11:35 PM Minnemooseus has replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 640 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 3 of 7 (729679)
06-16-2014 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Minnemooseus
06-16-2014 11:16 PM


Re: A belemnite, a ?, and a barnacle
Darn. A tooth would be much more romantic. .. but having those two marine fossils makes sense.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-16-2014 11:16 PM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-17-2014 2:32 AM ramoss has not replied

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 4 of 7 (729681)
06-16-2014 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by ramoss
06-16-2014 10:32 PM


#2 a weathered surface of a rock?
It would be better to have the rock in hand, but via photo it looks like you have a slab of rock that has a weathered surface (the lighter color). The darker areas are just where the weathered rock has been chipped or worn off.
That's my best guess.
Moose
Edited by Minnemooseus, : Typo, and didn't bother using preview.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ramoss, posted 06-16-2014 10:32 PM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by ramoss, posted 06-16-2014 11:50 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
ramoss
Member (Idle past 640 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 5 of 7 (729683)
06-16-2014 11:50 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Minnemooseus
06-16-2014 11:47 PM


Re: #2 a weathered surface of a rock?
I suspected that, but hope springs eternal. I didn't see any claw marks..

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Minnemooseus, posted 06-16-2014 11:47 PM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2134 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 6 of 7 (729685)
06-16-2014 11:54 PM


I also thought of a barnacle for that last one.

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 7 of 7 (729697)
06-17-2014 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by ramoss
06-16-2014 11:35 PM


PDB standard for δ13C
Belemnite trivia of sorts (nod to Carbon Coyote, who may know about this).
quote:
In geochemistry, paleoclimatology and paleoceanography δ13C is an isotopic signature, a measure of the ratio of stable isotopes 13C : 12C, reported in parts per thousand (per mil, ).[1]
and
quote:
The standard established for carbon-13 work was the Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) and was based on a Cretaceous marine fossil, Belemnitella americana, which was from the Pee Dee Formation in South Carolina. This material had an anomalously high 13C:12C ratio (0.0112372), and was established as δ13C value of zero. Use of this standard gives most natural material a negative δ13C.[2] The standards are used for verifying the accuracy of mass spectroscopy; as isotope studies became more common, the demand for the standard exhausted the supply. Other standards, including one known as VPDB (for "Vienna PDB") have replaced the original.[3]
Source
Damn, it sounds like they used up all the Pee Dee Belemnites.
Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by ramoss, posted 06-16-2014 11:35 PM ramoss has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024