Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Artificial Selection - Is the term simply convenient?
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


(1)
Message 13 of 37 (735900)
08-27-2014 5:09 PM


Missing the Real Issue
IMHO the real point isn't the man as part of nature part though it stems from us poking at things.
"Natural" selection and "Artificial" selection differ in that man is not (or little ) involved in the former and centrally involved in the later. But that isn't the important fundamental difference.
"Natural" selection has no end goal, no foresight, no global picture. Nothing beyond this individual member of a species and it's success or failure.
"Artificial" selection may have a very definite goal (short or long term), it incorporates the whole picture (that may be selecting individuals to increase the diversity of a rare species, e.g.). It may involve selecting for things that aren't part of the environment yet but are expected (e.g., higher heat tolerance of crops).
Yes, it requires us to do this but I don't see that as being the issue. If we were selecting individuals based on a coin flip then our effects may not be different from "artificial" selection even though we would be selecting.

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by AppleScratch, posted 08-27-2014 5:47 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024