|
Author
|
Topic: Age Correlations and An Old Earth, Version 2 No 1
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
Message 449 of 1498 (755581)
04-09-2015 5:40 PM
|
Reply to: Message 446 by JonF
04-09-2015 11:47 AM
|
|
Re: for zaius137
Back to the most pseudoscientific part then?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 446 by JonF, posted 04-09-2015 11:47 AM | | JonF has not replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
Re: for zaius137
Capt Stormfield writes: How do the trees manage to know in advance how old they are going to get? They don't, because the amount rings of the tree is meaningless to carbon-14 dating. You pretend to have studied this on a cell level. All rings of the tree tend to get bigger with age.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 451 by Coyote, posted 04-09-2015 7:15 PM | | OS has not replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
|
Message 453 of 1498 (755678)
04-10-2015 3:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 452 by RAZD
04-10-2015 2:30 PM
|
|
Re: OS and tree rings
Why didn't you notice how the rings in the middle are getting bigger? Did you ever notice that I don't respond to much? Usually, when you post to me, it is unworthy. I am unfamiliar with other instruments that do what a Geiger counter does. You thought I wanted to invalidate C14 dating? I know you are confused. Edited by OS, : No reason given. Edited by OS, : No reason given. Edited by OS, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 452 by RAZD, posted 04-10-2015 2:30 PM | | RAZD has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 454 by JonF, posted 04-10-2015 4:05 PM | | OS has not replied | | | Message 455 by RAZD, posted 04-10-2015 5:33 PM | | OS has not replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
Re: OS and tree rings
It's a myth. Tree ring dating does not improve radiocarbon dating, and the data prove it. Tree rings are not all produced one per year; and they aren't very distinct in small trees. It's NUTBALL JUNK. It is obvious radiocarbon dating is not based on it. Edited by OS, : No reason given. Edited by OS, : No reason given.
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
|
Message 465 of 1498 (755732)
04-11-2015 1:12 AM
|
Reply to: Message 464 by Coyote
04-10-2015 11:25 PM
|
|
Re: OS and tree rings
Coyote writes: Your ignorance concerning radiocarbon dating is exceeded only by your zeal in trying to discredit the technique.
You know what they say about the words assume and assumptions. Edited by OS, : No reason given.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 464 by Coyote, posted 04-10-2015 11:25 PM | | Coyote has not replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
|
Message 470 of 1498 (755791)
04-11-2015 3:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 466 by NoNukes
04-11-2015 2:18 AM
|
|
Re: OS and tree rings
NUCLEAR SPECTROSCOPY. Now that makes a lot more sense, and it explains why nuclear decay is based on a thermodynamic equation. And the early use of it on a meteorite almost explains the conclusion of isochrones. Radioactivity decreases evenly as you go down the earth's crust? 
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 466 by NoNukes, posted 04-11-2015 2:18 AM | | NoNukes has replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
|
Message 473 of 1498 (755799)
04-11-2015 5:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 471 by Coyote
04-11-2015 3:28 PM
|
|
Re: OS and tree rings
It does not explain how Lambda is measured with nuclear spectroscopy.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 471 by Coyote, posted 04-11-2015 3:28 PM | | Coyote has not replied |
|
OS
Member (Idle past 3293 days) Posts: 67 Joined: 06-22-2014
|
|
|
Message 475 of 1498 (755801)
04-11-2015 5:19 PM
|
Reply to: Message 474 by Coragyps
04-11-2015 5:05 PM
|
|
Re: OS and tree rings
It is a method of determining elements.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 474 by Coragyps, posted 04-11-2015 5:05 PM | | Coragyps has replied |
|
™ Version 4.2