How many times do I have to tell you that I don't care about 'accuracy' or what 'actually' happened?
Any time you raise a question about the motive for the author leaving something out, the question of what 'actually happened' is inherent in your question. Your position inherently makes a statement about what actually happened, or what the author's sources say happened.
It does not matter how many times you explicitly deny caring about what happened, when your questions and posts say something else.
It's not my fault if your thread is stupid.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
Je Suis Charlie
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
™ Version 4.2