I'm sorry, I guess you'll have to explain that to me a little better.
It was pointed out in the Gun thread that citing the desire to preserve life as a motivating factor behind gun control is hypocritical if there are clearly more effective ways of saving lives, especially if those other ways are deliberately ignored.
So I suppose 'immoral' might not be the best word and places too much of my own value judgements on the situation. But if people claim that saving lives is their goal (and this thread is directed at such people), then it only makes sense to take the next step of figuring out how to go about maximizing our use off resources by meeting that goal as fully as possible.
I guess this thread is a chance for folks from the Gun thread to put up evidence where it can be challenged: to put up our shut up, as it were. Though I'm not limiting the discussion only to comparisons with gun control.
Love your enemies!