Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,393 Year: 3,650/9,624 Month: 521/974 Week: 134/276 Day: 8/23 Hour: 4/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win.
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 2887 (767934)
09-03-2015 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Dr Adequate
09-03-2015 1:02 AM


Comments?
Just clean it up a bit. You have some excessive and unnecessary overlaps.
I'd keep the images in the same spots but fine tune the placement to minimize overlap. And for sure don't cover up parts of the actual fossil portion of the image below you, like Archy and Habilis are doing.
Crop more of the background out of Ergaster and move his neighbors inward. That blue and yellow part sticks out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-03-2015 1:02 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 26 of 2887 (767973)
09-03-2015 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Faith
09-03-2015 10:09 PM


This is a perfect description of YEC:
Because once the paradigm was established and accepted there was nothing to do but build upon it and within it. It has become an entrenched assumption or presupposition. There is enough seeming evidence, or at least plausibility, to keep the system going, as long as tge few best bits of evidence are emphasized over and over and the difficult areas are sidestepped, which is very easy to do with a theory that is unprovable in the direct ways the hard sciences are provable.
Unprovable because the whole thing is an edifice of interpretation upon interpretation, none of it can be replicated, it can only be interpreted. You can't replicate the burial of dinosaurs, all you can do is interpret what you think must have happened, and in that enterprise you are limited by what has already been accepted, so you fit your bit of understanding into the already-constructed edifice. You add your interpretive plausible bit to the whole edifice and just keep building, although it has no foundation in actual fact, it's all mental conjurings. The whole thing is a gravity-defying reality-defying multiplication of interpretations floating some distance above planet earth. You have the illusion of science, the illusion of evidence, you mentally manipulate mental figments as if they were realities. It's all very convincing if you are entrenched in the system yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Faith, posted 09-03-2015 10:09 PM Faith has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 435 of 2887 (812398)
06-16-2017 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 434 by aristotle
06-16-2017 10:45 AM


If they don't even know exactly what a species is, how can they tell when there are different ones?
If you don't know exactly where that picture transitions from one color to the other, then how can you say the top is white and the bottom is black?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 434 by aristotle, posted 06-16-2017 10:45 AM aristotle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024