Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Feature: Message Rating System
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3983
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 75 of 258 (578859)
09-02-2010 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Admin
09-02-2010 7:56 PM


Re: About the Hall of Shame...
Go medieval.
God, King, Lords, Knights: then everyone is looking good. Screw the lurking serfs.
Alternatively, start with the king and let the serfs in: hard call.
Edited by Omnivorous, : No reason given.

Have you ever been to an American wedding? Where's the vodka? Where's the marinated herring?!
-Gogol Bordello

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Admin, posted 09-02-2010 7:56 PM Admin has seen this message but not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3983
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 76 of 258 (578868)
09-02-2010 10:14 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by hooah212002
09-02-2010 8:15 PM


Re: About the Hall of Shame...
How about letting each group in the hierarchy name itself? Polls and votes are easy, I think, and we all like picking our own names.
That would be revealing, adaptable and commercially attractive.

Have you ever been to an American wedding? Where's the vodka? Where's the marinated herring?!
-Gogol Bordello

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by hooah212002, posted 09-02-2010 8:15 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by hooah212002, posted 09-02-2010 10:21 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3983
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


Message 78 of 258 (578873)
09-02-2010 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by hooah212002
09-02-2010 10:21 PM


Re: About the Hall of Shame...
I grok nerd.
I wonder if full moderation is available here in the sense that many debate sites use it, holding posts until they've been vetted: HuffingtonPost turns it on for especially controversial topics, usually relying on filters, spot checks and complaints. It's something you might want to have in a commerical product.
I prefer the lack of pre-post censorship we've always had here.
But maybe that's just me. It would be a good variable switch to have: members subject to full modding, some only to filters, some no modding at all.
The best part? You could pay-off the mods.
If it works for the justice system, it can work here.
AbE: No, what you suggested is congruent.
Edited by Omnivorous, : It's a secret.

Have you ever been to an American wedding? Where's the vodka? Where's the marinated herring?!
-Gogol Bordello

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by hooah212002, posted 09-02-2010 10:21 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3983
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.0


(1)
Message 249 of 258 (768062)
09-05-2015 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by Tanypteryx
09-05-2015 1:12 PM


Well said.

"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-05-2015 1:12 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024