Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Christianity Evil?
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 69 of 120 (769420)
09-20-2015 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by GDR
09-20-2015 5:23 PM


GDR writes:
My post was a response to your representation of Christianity which is presumably your opinion as to what the Christian message is.
I don't have an opinion of what the Christian message is, I'm just reporting what most of them say it is. You have an opinion, they have different ones. As do all the others. There's no way of knowing whether any of them are correct - people just seem to either accept the one they're born into, or, if they're lucky enough to live in a liberal democracy, pick the one that suits their personality best.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by GDR, posted 09-20-2015 5:23 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by GDR, posted 09-20-2015 9:05 PM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 71 of 120 (769450)
09-21-2015 3:59 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by GDR
09-20-2015 9:05 PM


GDR writes:
We are called to choose the good thing simply because it is the right thing and that is where our heart is.
And that is true for all people whether believers or not. The only people who do not have that instinct are those that are mentally ill.
Religious belief is therefore redundant - an unnecessary and often dangerous addition to something that is normal human behaviour.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by GDR, posted 09-20-2015 9:05 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Phat, posted 09-21-2015 12:07 PM Tangle has replied
 Message 75 by GDR, posted 09-21-2015 2:06 PM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 74 of 120 (769471)
09-21-2015 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Phat
09-21-2015 12:07 PM


Re: Untangling the mystery
GDR writes:
There is only one God.
No there isn't. (Do you see the problem with bald assertions?)
No redundancy...unless you insist on elevating yourself up to such a humanistic standard.
GDR said that anyone who leads a good life would get to heaven (i paraphrase). Therefore a belief in God is redundant.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Phat, posted 09-21-2015 12:07 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 76 of 120 (769499)
09-21-2015 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by GDR
09-21-2015 2:06 PM


GDR writes:
don't think I'd call it an instinct. We have an instinct for survival but I don't agree that we have an instinct for unselfish love.
Of course we do, empathy is a normal, everyday human emotion.
I think that humans are basically more drawn to look after one's own interest even if it is at the expense of another.
That's not true at all. Humans behave differently in different circumstances but there are countless examples of self-sacrifice and we put our close family in front of ourselves routinely.
This idea that only the religious do unselfish things is crazy, and a tad insulting.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by GDR, posted 09-21-2015 2:06 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by GDR, posted 09-21-2015 7:27 PM Tangle has replied
 Message 79 by Jon, posted 09-21-2015 9:08 PM Tangle has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 81 of 120 (769543)
09-22-2015 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by GDR
09-21-2015 7:27 PM


GDR writes:
I suggest that both of our positions can be true. It is my contention that our natural predilection is to choose the path of self interest.
Our natural predilection is to both look after people and to look after ourselves. We have both instincts in a precarious balance. Keeping the balance towards pro-social activities was once the province of the church and the king - often the same thing. Modern socities do it through criminal justice systems, democratic processes, education and other social structures.
People will keep or hand in the $10 bill depending on all sorts of circumstances - a big one is whether anyone is watching. That's a classic sociological experiment which demonstrates that people have both emotions/instincts - if they didn't care what others thought of them and were only self-centred, they'd pocket the bill every time.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by GDR, posted 09-21-2015 7:27 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by GDR, posted 09-22-2015 12:49 PM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


(1)
Message 84 of 120 (769569)
09-22-2015 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by GDR
09-22-2015 12:49 PM


GDR writes:
We do have a natrural instinct for self preservation but beyond that we also have a natural instinct for self interest.
This is just mincing words - self interest and self preservation are all part of the same instinct/mechanism which all animals have.
I don't agree that caring for others at the expense of our own self interest is at all instinctive.
You don't have to agree, it's an observable behaviour. Empathy is instinctive and primitive behaviour that can be measured by fMRI.
I'd suggest that we do have, that still small voice that nudges in an altruistic direction but that also it is a learned behaviour from our parents, friends society etc.
Your 'still small voice' is an emotion, an instict - brain activity. It is reinforced by parents and society, but it is there regardless - with the exception of pyschopaths where no amount of societal interventions can make them 'normal' - they have to mechanically learn the behaviours expected of them, they don't 'feel' them.
That is contradictory to your view that doing the right thing is an instinctive response. The criminal justice system is about getting people to do the right thing out of self interest. It argues for the idea that self interest is the naturally instinctive thing. It pushes you do the right thing out of self interest so that you don't wind up being imprisoned.
No it doesn't. people have both the selfish instinct and the selfless instinct - they're in balance and can swing either way depending on circumstances. One important circumstance is whether anyone is watching.
It goes back to it being about where our heart is. If our heart is right we return the $10 because we are prepared to put the other person's interest ahead of our own. If our heart is not right we keep the $10 for ourselves.
Some people always would, some people always wouldn't. Most people would be inbetween. It depends on many unknown variables. In your case one important variable would be your belief that Jesus would expect you to return it. In my case it would be because my values - which were derived frim my society, my parents, my own innate sense of right and wrong, and whether I needed it to save the world etc etc etc.
Edited by Tangle, : No reason given.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by GDR, posted 09-22-2015 12:49 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by GDR, posted 09-23-2015 11:54 AM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 89 of 120 (769647)
09-23-2015 5:07 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by GDR
09-23-2015 11:54 AM


GDR writes:
Just because it can be observed with changes in the brain does not make it instinctive.
You have singled out empathy as a special, god given, attribute for no other reason than it correlates with your beliefs system. This 'still small voice' and 'heart' stuff is just you saying god does it. In fact it's just another emotion like anger or fear. It's a human instinct (which is found in many other social animals.) Why do you not think that anger - 'the turbulent, large voice' is not the devil? Or do you?
Of course it involves brain activity. It requires thought.
I've tried to explain this to you before but you seem to prefer to forget it. Most of the brain does not deal with rational decision making - executive functioning. Almost all of it - the most primitive parts deal with autonomous functioning - the things that allow you to breath and walk and pump blood around your body without having to actually think about it. Empathy is one such autonomus function - we don't think about wether we feel sorry for another person's predicament, we instinctively feel it. That instinct is developed to greater or lessor degree by traing and background. But can be entirely missing.
This feeling can be seen with fMRI and is not in your control - like a knee jerk reflex, it's not a thought process it's a reaction. Of course after the feeling of compassion happens, the rational brain can then decide what to do about it, but the body has already cast its vote.
Empathy and compassion is not a thought process or a rational choice it starts as a feeling and often stays that way.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by GDR, posted 09-23-2015 11:54 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by GDR, posted 09-25-2015 2:50 PM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 92 of 120 (769859)
09-25-2015 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by GDR
09-25-2015 2:50 PM


GDR writes:
Your position is also based on your atheistic beliefs.
To coin a phrase 'Oh Good grief'.
My position is based on our hard won scientific knowledge. You have singled out a specific human emotion called compassion or empathy and made it supernatural. Does that really make sense to you? Empathy is a physiological, measurable, predictable, replicable, reflex reaction found in all people - with the exception the mentally ill.
I have no background in this
As it seems so important to you, why don't you read some papers on it - these things are regularly reported in the press. It seems daft ro me to carry on making mistakes about the stuff we're learning about.
Also again, you are describing a process. It is a process that exists and whether or not it is the result of nothing but natural processes or if it is part of a designed process, (no I'm not into ID), is a matter of belief.
It is part of a process and it does exist - it's real and it's natural. It's no different than happiness, love or anger, lust, fear, saddness - whatever the complex list is now. There's no reason whatsoever to single empathy out as special and non-evolved. Of course you can say that your god set all that in motion at 'the creation' and I can't argue with that but I can argue with you if - as seems to be the case - that you are saying that god is intervening with this still little voice stuff in real time. Is that your position?

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by GDR, posted 09-25-2015 2:50 PM GDR has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Phat, posted 09-26-2015 2:00 AM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 94 of 120 (769876)
09-26-2015 3:05 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Phat
09-26-2015 2:00 AM


Re: Evidence vs Belief
Phat writes:
believe this. I believe that God intervenes. I cant describe how it happens--There is no concrete evidence that it has happened, or is happening, or will happen....and thus I have no defense in support of my belief.
Well that's your prerogative - you can believe what you like.
But it's rather hard to unscramble just what it is that you and GDR mean by this 'still small voice'. In this discussion it's been about feeling empathy and compassion for others and therefore being motivated to help them. Are you saying that the feeling of empathy you have when you see another human suffer is god speaking directly to you every time you feel it?

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Phat, posted 09-26-2015 2:00 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Phat, posted 09-26-2015 9:21 AM Tangle has replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 9510
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 4.8


Message 96 of 120 (769894)
09-26-2015 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Phat
09-26-2015 9:21 AM


Re: Empathy in general vs "still small voice"
Well there's nothing I can say to that Phat except you're just making stuff up.
Don't you think it more likely that people have different quantities of empathy like they have different quantities of height? That they might pick up caring values from others or that they may just find vocation that suits them? Why does god have to get directly involved and how? Why you and not me, or the guy next door? And how do you know?

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif.
Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Phat, posted 09-26-2015 9:21 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024