Evolution Requires Reduction in Genetic Diversity

That was actually a question, put in order for you to represent your argument clearly. Let me put it again. Would you say that O. aries has less diversity than O. orientalis?

Er, no. It's a line of demarcation that exists in nature. It's the one classification that isn't artificial, arbitrary, or subjective. Now, do you really wish to claim that two populations that can't interbreed are the same species? If so, what's to stop us from saying that you're the same species as a chimpanzee?

Instead of changing the English language so that "speciation is impossible" is what you want to say, why not change what you're saying until it's what you would say if you spoke English like everyone else?

You remember how in every example we've looked at, evolution works how geneticists think it works and not how you think it works?Why do you think that is?

But observably they do. I guess geneticists put "way too much trust" in observations, they should follow your lead and ignore the observable facts, maybe? Then they might agree with you. 'Course, in that case they would not, strictly speaking, be geneticists.

Oh Faith, not again, not again.