Your arguments seem to be against evolution.
You should be making arguments that support your proposal.
From my point of view, if there are two people then there are three answers.
1. My answer which may be wrong or incomplete
2. Your answer which may be wrong or incomplete
3. THE ANSWER which we don't know and are trying to find out
Just because I'm wrong doesn't make you right. We both could be wrong.
For example (non-biologist so may be stupid examples) -
Finding parent-child species and showing which genes were lost and that no genes were added.
Finding DNA from specimens either extinct or at least very old and comparing to current specimens. Did ancient bear carcasses found in caves have more functioning genes than current bears?