Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How long does it take to evolve?
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(5)
Message 33 of 221 (769831)
09-25-2015 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by Lamden
09-24-2015 3:39 PM


Re: Thanks to all of you for reading my question
Lamden writes:
Then, we will try and estimate how long each change ought to take on average.
Isn't that a bit like trying to calculate the average mass of every organism on earth? What would that "average" even mean?
If you wanted to argue that there hasn't been enough geological time for evolution to occur, you'd need to know the maximum speed of evolution. What's the point of knowing the "average"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Lamden, posted 09-24-2015 3:39 PM Lamden has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 169 of 221 (770721)
10-13-2015 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by NoNukes
10-11-2015 8:37 PM


Re: What is plausible, what can be tested
NoNukes writes:
In nature we see certainly do see reuse of designs.
But what we don't see is retro-fitting of the improved designs across the board. Once the better octopus eye was invented, why wouldn't a designer rewrite the DNA of mammals to use it? After fancy electric headlights were designed for cars, we don't still see aircraft flying around with candles.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by NoNukes, posted 10-11-2015 8:37 PM NoNukes has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 213 of 221 (770966)
10-16-2015 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 212 by MrHambre
10-16-2015 1:24 PM


Re: The Limits of Skepticism
Mrhambre writes:
There just seems to be a siege mentality where people would rather not acknowledge problems with scientific inquiry.
I think it has more to do with wanting to get on with the inquiry instead of obsessing about how the inquiry is done. It's like going in vacation instead of incessantly planning the perfect vacation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 212 by MrHambre, posted 10-16-2015 1:24 PM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024