Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are religions manmade and natural or supernaturally based?
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 424 of 511 (773268)
11-27-2015 3:10 PM
Reply to: Message 422 by Modulous
11-27-2015 1:12 PM


Hi Mod,
Mod writes:
If time did not exist there was no time in which one can exist in, in order to wait 'until' time existed. If time's existence starts at the Big Bang, then there was no before it.
What would be the mechanism that caused time to begin to exist at the Big Bang.
Mod writes:
Therefore, there are no points in time, when there are no points in time. There are no points in space where there are no points in space.
So when there was no point in time and no points in space there was non existence.
I don't know if you can visualize non existence or not. Non existence would mean there would be no quarks, no vacuum, no space, no time, no place for anything to exist, there would be an absence of any thing.
That would mean the singularity (at which a function takes an infinite value) could not exist as it would be absent in non existence.
What mechanism would you propose to solve that problem?
I propose an eternally existing Supernatural Power I call God that could provide the infinite energy and mass that forms our universe today.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 422 by Modulous, posted 11-27-2015 1:12 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 425 by Modulous, posted 11-27-2015 3:21 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 427 of 511 (773281)
11-28-2015 4:26 AM
Reply to: Message 425 by Modulous
11-27-2015 3:21 PM


Hi Mod,
Mod writes:
Nope, there was never a when there was no point in time and there is not a place where there are no points in space. There was never non-existence.
So what existed at T=0?
I can tell you what did not exist there.
There was no universe.
There was no space-time.
There was no energy.
There was no mass.
There was no vacuum.
None of these things existed until T=0-9 according to the standard model.
There was also non existence there as nothing exists outside of the universe according to the BBT.
Yet 1 nano second after T=0 the universe existed and was expanding according to the Big Bang Theory.
T=0 had to exist for T=0-9 to exist.
T=0 had to exist for there to be a duration measured as 0-9 which is a nano second, which equals to 1 billionth of a second.
So the universe had a beginning to exist at T=0-9 according to the BBT.
Since Space-time, energy, and mass are a part of the universe they had to have a beginning to exist at T=0-9.
So what existed at T=0?
If the BBT is correct there was non existence at T=0.
Mod writes:
There is no mechanism. There is no cause.
So let me get what you are telling me straight .
The universe began to exist at T=0-9with space-time in the universe as well as all the energy and mass that can be observed as well as that that can not be observed.. Therefore there is no point in time the universe did not exist nor no point in space the universe did not exist. Yet the universe can not exit in time or space as they are in the universe not outside the universe for the universe to exist in.
This sounds like the cat chasing his tail, or circular reasoning.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 425 by Modulous, posted 11-27-2015 3:21 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 429 by Modulous, posted 11-28-2015 4:43 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 428 of 511 (773282)
11-28-2015 4:32 AM
Reply to: Message 426 by NoNukes
11-27-2015 3:42 PM


Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
Let's consider your response, ICANT. I provide you three links with answers to the question what is gravity. You then provide a link in which one person says that there is no answer.
Sorry you didn't like the information from Nasa's child website.
You need to be a little more specific than just post links. Because I could not find any answer to the question what is gravity?
So could you be specific and post quotes from the links that support your assertions.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 426 by NoNukes, posted 11-27-2015 3:42 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 433 by NoNukes, posted 11-28-2015 2:44 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 436 of 511 (773319)
11-29-2015 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 433 by NoNukes
11-28-2015 2:44 PM


Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
The theory of general relativity completely describes what gravity is. On each of the links you can find an answer to the effect that gravity is a curvature of space time created by mass.
My question: "What is Gravity"?
Your answer general relativity completely describes what gravity is.
Then you say each link you gave gives me the effects of gravity.
Holding an apple in my hand at arms length and turning my hand over and the effects of that, is that the apple will hit the floor. Simply gives me the results of gravity. It has nothing to do with what gravity is.
Neither do the effect of gravity in your 3 links tell me what gravity is.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 433 by NoNukes, posted 11-28-2015 2:44 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 437 by Phat, posted 11-29-2015 3:41 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied
 Message 440 by NoNukes, posted 11-30-2015 12:35 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 438 of 511 (773322)
11-29-2015 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 430 by Phat
11-28-2015 9:51 AM


Re: Creation Through Imagination
Hi Phat,
Phat writes:
Coming from a human source, the wisdom essentially boils down to humans---by virtue of their ability to figure it out---having explained the Beginning. Thus, it seems to me that in so doing that, we have claimed the ability to explain---or at least theorize--all past, present, and future. Does anyone understand where I am going with this?
But they have not explained the beginning.
They think they have figured out what happened after T=0-9 but prior to that anything would be pure speculation. So the beginning is pure speculation.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 430 by Phat, posted 11-28-2015 9:51 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


(1)
Message 439 of 511 (773324)
11-29-2015 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 429 by Modulous
11-28-2015 4:43 AM


Hi Mod,
Mod writes:
So what existed at T=0?
Everything.
Then where did it exist?
Mod writes:
My point is that there isn't a Gap of Non-existence to squeeze your God into. You'll have to find somewhere else, or try to butcher a different cosmology model.
Are we in agreement that the universe is self contained and there is nothing outside of the universe according to the standard theory?
If that is true then there are two choices as to why the universe exists.
It is either eternal or had a beginning to exist, which is it?
If the universe has not existed eternally in the past in some form it had to have a beginning to exist.
If it had a beginning to exist that would require non existence preceded the universe.
And the universe spontaneously begin to exist from non existence.
OR
There was a Supernatural Power which is outside of the universe to provide the energy and mass the universe was formed from.
God Bless,
Edited by ICANT, : No reason given.

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 429 by Modulous, posted 11-28-2015 4:43 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 441 by Modulous, posted 11-30-2015 3:29 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 444 by AZPaul3, posted 11-30-2015 7:10 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 445 by Pressie, posted 11-30-2015 8:08 AM ICANT has not replied
 Message 446 by Admin, posted 11-30-2015 8:09 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 448 of 511 (773354)
11-30-2015 11:21 AM
Reply to: Message 440 by NoNukes
11-30-2015 12:35 AM


Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
If you don't find the distinction between substance and effects clear, then feel free to ask me yet again, what is gravity. But please, stop pretending that no answer has been given.
The first source you gave says:
quote:
Two objects exert a force of attraction on one another known as "gravity." Sir Isaac Newton quantified the gravity between two objects when he formulated his three laws of motion.
So 2 objects of mass exert a force that attracts each other. Whatever is doing the attraction is called gravity.
The first page shows a picture of the earth warping space on one side of the earth. What happens to the space on the other side of the earth? Does it warp out the same way? If it does what fills the void between the surface of the earth and this curved space?
Your second link says:
quote:
Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity is one of the towering achievements of 20th-century physics. Published in 1916, it explains that what we perceive as the force of gravity in fact arises from the curvature of space and time.
Einstein proposed that objects such as the sun and the Earth change this geometry. In the presence of matter and energy it can evolve, stretch and warp, forming ridges, mountains and valleys that cause bodies moving through it to zigzag and curve. So although Earth appears to be pulled towards the sun by gravity, there is no such force. It is simply the geometry of space-time around the sun telling Earth how to move.
This says there is no such force as gravity.
This says there is no such force that the mass of the sun and the mass of the earth attract one another.
That would mean when I take the apple in my hand at arms length and turn it upside down the apple will stay in my upside down hand.
The third link says:
quote:
As we have seen, matter does not simply pull on other matter across empty space, as Newton had imagined. Rather matter distorts space-time and it is this distorted space-time that in turn affects other matter
This one says matter does pull on other matter and it distorts space-time. It goes on to say this distorted space-time affects other matter.
It does not say distorted space-time causes matter to pull on other matter.
I still can't find what gravity is. I find that the effects of gravity is that things don't fly apart and we don't float around on earth like we would in zero gravity.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 440 by NoNukes, posted 11-30-2015 12:35 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 452 by NoNukes, posted 11-30-2015 11:57 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 456 by AZPaul3, posted 11-30-2015 2:21 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 449 of 511 (773356)
11-30-2015 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 446 by Admin
11-30-2015 8:09 AM


Hi Admin,
Talking about gravity if basically for educational purposes. But I did propose that The Supernatural Power I call God holds the universe together.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 446 by Admin, posted 11-30-2015 8:09 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 459 by Admin, posted 11-30-2015 4:39 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied
 Message 460 by NoNukes, posted 12-04-2015 12:11 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 461 by dwise1, posted 12-05-2015 5:08 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 450 of 511 (773358)
11-30-2015 11:31 AM
Reply to: Message 442 by Pressie
11-30-2015 5:55 AM


Hi Pressie,
Pressie writes:
How do you know that it was a he?
I was privileged to meet Him in 1964 when I was dead for 3 hours.
I know you won't believe that and I can't help your unbelief.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 442 by Pressie, posted 11-30-2015 5:55 AM Pressie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 451 by ringo, posted 11-30-2015 11:36 AM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 453 of 511 (773371)
11-30-2015 1:58 PM
Reply to: Message 441 by Modulous
11-30-2015 3:29 AM


Hi Mod,
Mod writes:
Then where did it exist?
Everywhere.
But everywhere did not exist.
Mod writes:
It is either eternal or had a beginning to exist, which is it?
It has a finite past. I think that leaves us with less room for equivocation, so let's use that.
Just what do you mean by a finite past?
Stephen Hawking said in "The Beginning of Time":
quote:
The conclusion of this lecture is that the universe has not existed forever. Rather, the universe, and time itself, had a beginning in the Big Bang, about 15 billion years ago.
I can find no added footnote to that lecture on his website so I would assume it still holds. The page you were looking for doesn't exist (404)
Mod writes:
The concept of 'preceding' the universe makes no sense in light of the fact that there is nothing except the universe.
But that universe has not existed forever. That means it had a beginning to exist.
How could it begin to exist?
Mod writes:
There was a Supernatural Power which is outside of the universe to provide the energy and mass the universe was formed from.
Well, no. There are more than two possibilities. Many of them don't require a supernatural power. But let's stick with getting you to understand my godless universe before we start worrying about other possibilities.
Yes there is several possibilities but we are discussing the universe according to the standard model.
1. The Supernatural power I call God could have supplied the energy and mass that created our universe.
2. The Hartly/Hawking instanton could have created the universe.
3. Two branes bumping together could have created the universe.
4. A former universe that had collapsed into a singularity could have created the universe.
5. The universe could have spontaneously created itself from non existence.
6. The universe could have existed eternally in the past but it would be dead by now. This was the reason for Einstein's fudge factor to make the universe static.
#1 would be self sustaining.
#2 & 3 would require existence to exist that they could appear in for them to be able to create the universe.
#4 would require some mechanism to supply energy and mass, as the universe's lasting for an eternity would be dead by now as the energy would have all become useless energy.
If you want me to understand your Godless universe you need to provide a mechanism whereby the infinite energy existed at T=0-9 and began to expand creating your Godless universe.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 441 by Modulous, posted 11-30-2015 3:29 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 454 by Modulous, posted 11-30-2015 2:09 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 455 of 511 (773373)
11-30-2015 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 452 by NoNukes
11-30-2015 11:57 AM


Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
Example:
quote:
Einstein realized that massive objects caused a distortion in space-time. Imagine setting a large body in the center of a trampoline. The body would press down into the fabric, causing it to dimple. A marble rolled around the edge would spiral inward toward the body, pulled in much the same way that the gravity of a planet pulls at rocks in space.
That's right, the curvature of space time produces the effect we associate with gravity.
All you are doing now is cherry picking the descriptions from the articles and avoiding the answer to the question. You may have the last word on this matter.
What causes the curvature of the space time? Mass
" Imagine setting a large body in the center of a trampoline."
But space is not a sheet like a trampoline.
Space fills the universe everywhere there is not mass.
So actually the mass that is supposed to cause the curvature of space time is more like a fish in a fish bowl. The fish has water all around him and the mass has space all around it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 452 by NoNukes, posted 11-30-2015 11:57 AM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 457 by NoNukes, posted 11-30-2015 2:32 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 462 of 511 (773785)
12-09-2015 4:04 AM
Reply to: Message 461 by dwise1
12-05-2015 5:08 AM


Hi d,
d writes:
I am an agnostic. I do not believe that we are even able to KNOW such things.
You do know that what you or I believe does not make any difference in the total scheme of things.
But if you had read the thread before jumping in you might have understood what I was talking about.
In Message 46 answering a question GIA asked I said:
quote:
Greatest I am writes:
Do you think Gods are manmade or do you believe in a supernatural God?
I believe in a supernatural God.
Everybody says why?
Scientific fact: The universe has not always existed.
Scientific fact: The universe had a beginning to exist.
Scientific fact: The universe exists.
Before the universe there would have been an absence of anything. No space, time, matter, energy, or vacuum, as all those began to exist when the universe began to exist.
Now whatever caused the universe to have a beginning to exist from an absence of anything would be a supernatural power.
I call that supernatural power God, what do you call it?
In Message 110 I also said:
quote:
Since the universe exists there had to be a supernatural power that is outside of the universe to provide the energy required to produce the mass and energy of the universe.
Energy and mass can not be created or destroyed is a law of physics.
Which would require a supernatural power to supply the energy and mass required to produce the universe as it is known.
I call that supernatural power God. If you have an alternative to a supernatural power please present it.
Now correct me if I am wrong in the following.
1. The universe has not existed eternally in the past. If it did it would have been dead a long time ago as there would be no useable energy left as energy can not be created or destroyed.
2. The universe does exist today.
3. Since the universe did not exist eternally in the past but it does exist today means the universe had a beginning to exist.
4. Since energy is required to produce the mass that makes up everything in the universe that energy had to be supplied by some means.
4. This energy could not exist inside the universe as the universe did not exist.
5. If there is nothing outside the universe to provide that energy that was required to produce the mass that formed the universe it would not exist today.
6. No universe existing and nothing existing outside the universe would be non existence. Non existence can not produce anything.
7. Since the universe does exist and could not have existed eternally in the past, the universe had a beginning to exist.
8. Energy had to exist or there had to be an entity that existed that could provide the energy required to produce the universe and everything in it.
9. I call that Supernatural energy God.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 461 by dwise1, posted 12-05-2015 5:08 AM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 466 by NoNukes, posted 12-09-2015 12:29 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 467 by Modulous, posted 12-10-2015 4:35 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 463 of 511 (773789)
12-09-2015 5:51 AM
Reply to: Message 460 by NoNukes
12-04-2015 12:11 PM


Hi NoNukes,
NoNukes writes:
1. Dark energy does not hold the universe together. Dark energy provides an expansion effect and not a holding together effect.
2. Dark matter (which is not the same thing as dark energy) is detectable by the gravity it produces via gravitational effects which are visible.
I do not believe that God is dark energy or dark matter as I told you I do not equate the three.
I did state that God is the energy that holds the universe and everything in it together. Colossians 1:17. This was written 2,000 years before anyone put forth something was required hold the universe together.
I also said God is what causes the universe to expand. Job 9:8, Psalm 104:2, Isaiah 40:22, 44:24, 45:12, 51:13, and Jeremiah 10:12, All these were written thousands of years before anyone knew the universe was expanding.
You know that sounds like the Bible made predictions thousands of years before science came up with those ideas.
NoNukes writes:
I thought you might be interested in what science says about gravity,
Well science says gravity is what causes the curvature of spacetime.
Then turns around and says that the curvature of spacetime causes gravity.
From your first source:
quote:
The tug of gravity
Two objects exert a force of attraction on one another known as "gravity." Sir Isaac Newton quantified the gravity between two objects when he formulated his three laws of motion. The force tugging between two bodies depends on how massive each one is and how far apart the two lie.
From your second source:
quote:
1. PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity is one of the towering achievements of 20th-century physics. Published in 1916, it explains that what we perceive as the force of gravity in fact arises from the curvature of space and time.
From your third source:
quote:
As we have seen, matter does not simply pull on other matter across empty space, as Newton had imagined. Rather matter distorts space-time and it is this distorted space-time that in turn affects other matter.
So which is it? They don't agree.
What kind of an entity is space time that it can be affected or have an effect on another entity?
I know it is not a trampoline or a rubber sheet. I know it does not look like the picture on the opening page of your first source. Space surrounds the entire earth not just one side like the trampoline and bowling ball that is always used to explain how mass curves space time.
The earth in space is like a fish in water it only takes up the space the mass occupies.
It is a lot easier for me to believe the Supernatural power that was required to supply the energy that formed the mass of the universe and everything in it to put certain laws into effect and everything in the universe obeys those laws. That is except mankind, who chooses to believe what mankind wants to believe and do what mankind decides to do.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 460 by NoNukes, posted 12-04-2015 12:11 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 464 by Admin, posted 12-09-2015 8:50 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 465 by NoNukes, posted 12-09-2015 12:10 PM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 468 of 511 (773882)
12-10-2015 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 467 by Modulous
12-10-2015 4:35 AM


Hi Mod,
Mod writes:
The energy simply exists, it didn't pop into existence, it just exists.
That statement would require that energy existed eternally in the past.
If the energy existed eternally in the past, why did it wait so long to create the universe?
Better yet what caused it to start the process of creating the universe.
But wouldn't that mean that the energy exists outside of the universe? You have told me several times in the past that there is nothing outside the universe, as it is self contained.
I have been told on this web site in no uncertain terms that there is nothing outside of the universe. If that is true your energy could not just exist.
The energy just existing would require some place to exist, where did it exist? The universe did not exist.
I believe that energy did exist. That is the reason I believe in a Supernatural power that supplied the energy required to create the universe we live in.
The alternative is unthinkable. Existence beginning to exist from non existence.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 467 by Modulous, posted 12-10-2015 4:35 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by Modulous, posted 12-10-2015 12:59 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 480 by Modulous, posted 12-10-2015 2:40 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 469 of 511 (773886)
12-10-2015 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 464 by Admin
12-09-2015 8:50 AM


Re: Moderator Provided Information
Hi Admin,
I am sorry that my mind does not run in the same ruts that yours and others here does.
The statements are:
Mass has a pull on mass.
Mass warps space-time.
That warped space-time then causes gravity to work. The trampoline and ball example is then used to support that concept.
I just spent the better part of an hour staring at a little ball running around a vortex caused by the earth warping space-time here. What Is Gravity? | NASA Space Place — NASA Science for Kids
My mind may be what is warped but I see a problem with the example.
The mass of the earth would have to exert the same effect on all of space-time that surrounds the earth. Which would nullify any effect on the little ball as there would be no indention towards the earth in which the ball could fall towards the earth.
That is the reason I have used the example several times that the mass in space-time would be like a fish in water. The mass would only displace space-time where it exists. Therefore there would be no curvature of space-time as presented.
That brings us back to mass exerting pull on mass. Which means some kind of unknown energy (for a better word) operating in mysterious ways.
Now if I am misunderstanding the effect of mass on space-time maybe someone would explain to me how the trampoline or sheet effect could be true.
As always I believe it is all controlled by laws that the Supernatural power put into effect upon creation of the universe and everything in it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 464 by Admin, posted 12-09-2015 8:50 AM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 470 by Admin, posted 12-10-2015 12:14 PM ICANT has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024