Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 122 (8773 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-26-2017 10:31 AM
364 online now:
DrJones*, dronestar, dwise1, jar, New Cat's Eye, PaulK, RAZD, Vlad (8 members, 356 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Tom Larkin
Post Volume:
Total: 814,653 Year: 19,259/21,208 Month: 2,018/3,111 Week: 239/574 Day: 35/46 Hour: 3/5

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev1
2
Author Topic:   Proposal for Origin of Various Human Races
Jon
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 24 (757228)
05-05-2015 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by anglagard
05-04-2015 9:32 PM


Re: Another Problem With this Hypothesis
Jon is studying linguistics and may chime in as well.

I'm not aware of any accepted reconstructed proto languages that go back further than several thousand years or so. The reconstructions that do reach back far enough are not generally accepted as valid.

Joe's talking about stuff that (according to him) happened 50k years ago or more.

Comparative linguistics won't be much use here.

Edited by Jon, : No reason given.


Love your enemies!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by anglagard, posted 05-04-2015 9:32 PM anglagard has not yet responded

  
Zatara
Junior Member (Idle past 720 days)
Posts: 4
From: Richland
Joined: 05-07-2015


(1)
Message 17 of 24 (757329)
05-07-2015 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by caffeine
05-01-2015 8:14 AM


Re: Skin colour
You can add to this the fact that even with the original 3 classic divisions called "race" there is great variety of skin color as well as great variety of other features. As Jonathan Marks put it:

"By the 1970s, it had become clear that (1) most human differences were cultural; (2) what was not cultural was principally polymorphic that is to say, found in diverse groups of people at different frequencies; (3) what was not cultural or polymorphic was principally clinal that is to say, gradually variable over geography; and (4) what was left the component of human diversity that was not cultural, polymorphic, or clinal was very small.
A consensus consequently developed among anthropologists and geneticists that race as the previous generation had known it as largely discrete, geographically distinct, gene pools did not exist."

[from Human biodiversity: genes, race, and history (1995)]


This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by caffeine, posted 05-01-2015 8:14 AM caffeine has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Faith, posted 05-07-2015 6:00 PM Zatara has not yet responded

    
Faith
Member
Posts: 25606
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 18 of 24 (757354)
05-07-2015 5:34 PM


What I don't get about this whole discussion is why it isn't obvious that any group of living things, from plants to animals to human beings, develops its own limited gene pool when it becomes isolated from the rest of the population. This is what "races" are in any Species. Domestic breeding is an example of how it happens artificially by human choice: you get all the interesting breeds by isolating the genes/alleles that underlie their own peculiar characteristics, keeping them from interbreeding with other breeds of the same Species. Human beings become races simply by forming their own isolated groups and inbreeding among themselves for many generations. Sometimes a breed or race or variety of animals or plants becomes genetically incapable of interbreeding with others of their Species after being genetically reduced and isolated, but that has never happened with human races where interbreeding has always remained possible.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


    
Faith
Member
Posts: 25606
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 19 of 24 (757355)
05-07-2015 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Zatara
05-07-2015 11:01 AM


Re: Skin colour
A consensus consequently developed among anthropologists and geneticists that race as the previous generation had known it as largely discrete, geographically distinct, gene pools did not exist."

But that's what race IS, genetically speaking. You don't get particular characteristics without the specific genetic combinations that produce them, and where people have become geographically isolated in their migrations and spend generations inbreeding among themselves you're going to get exactly those "largely discrete, geographically distinct, gene pools" that underlie the identifiable traits of each isolated group.

Edited by Faith, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Zatara, posted 05-07-2015 11:01 AM Zatara has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by NoNukes, posted 05-20-2015 9:30 AM Faith has not yet responded

    
NoNukes
Member
Posts: 9738
From: Central NC USA
Joined: 08-13-2010
Member Rating: 3.1


(1)
Message 20 of 24 (758143)
05-20-2015 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Faith
05-07-2015 6:00 PM


Re: Skin colour
You don't get particular characteristics

How many characteristics does it take to constitute a race of people? Isn't the number of characteristics, and hence the number of fixed genetic combinations incredibly small? How many changes below neck level are required? And cannot more than one combination of genes produce a given result? Meanwhile the genes controlling non-race specific characteristics are free to have whatever variation and combination can be found. Even features like skin color are not homogeneous, nose shape, and hair coarseness vary within a race.

It is by examining the genetics of the races of humans on this earth that we can know that there is no limit to the diversity of the human race. In most cases there is much more variation within the race than there is distinction from another race.

How about providing us a mechanism for the death of people during the flood affecting the genomes of people or their descendants who did not die? How does someone else's death affect what Noah and sons pass on to their children and grand children? Wouldn't they instead just not pass on some combination rather than disabling something they already had?

Further, dumping out traits based on inbreeding does not explain very well the correlation of traits like skin color with geographies that we see. Those correlations suggest that selection played a role in what gene combinations survived at which did not.

Seriously, your answer seems to be that humans decided to make breeds out of themselves leaving no role for natural selection. The evidence does not support any of that.

Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.


Je Suis Charlie

Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)

If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass

The only thing I suggest is that genes died as a result of all those people and animals dying in the Flood, whose traits were lost to the species and therefore the alleles for those traits, so the genes just died and remain in the genome as corpses. Faith


This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Faith, posted 05-07-2015 6:00 PM Faith has not yet responded

    
Admin
Director
Posts: 12517
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 3.3


Message 21 of 24 (758155)
05-20-2015 2:36 PM


Moderator Topic Concern
I'm concerned that issues from the Evolution Requires Reduction in Genetic Diversity thread may be bleeding over into this thread. This thread is discussing the origin of the various human races and should only touch on genetics insofar as it provides evidence for specific scenarios. The other thread is discussing the premise that speciation isn't something that really happens, that all the species progenitors were created at creation, and that reductions in genetic diversity have produced all the various sub-species we see today.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

    
howling
Junior Member (Idle past 525 days)
Posts: 1
Joined: 11-14-2015


Message 22 of 24 (772810)
11-19-2015 6:24 AM


The website is here
http://human-races.weebly.com

This is where this info is contained for anyone who wants to know!

Thanks


Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Pressie, posted 11-19-2015 7:33 AM howling has not yet responded

    
Pressie
Member
Posts: 1696
From: Pretoria, SA
Joined: 06-18-2010
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 23 of 24 (772813)
11-19-2015 7:33 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by howling
11-19-2015 6:24 AM


Re: The website is here
Any website that starts off with something like
A RACE in human terms is a breed of man that evolves in TOTAL ISOLATION for at least 50,000 years (interbreeding occurs because of isolation and time). The Nordic Race was an inbred and homogeneous racial type with blond hair, big blue eyes, white skin, towering height (6 7ft Giants) and large cranial capacity (1600cc). All uniform in appearance, all the same!
cannot be a reliable source of information. It started off with a Gish Gallop of false information.

Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by howling, posted 11-19-2015 6:24 AM howling has not yet responded

    
Oswald Productions
Junior Member (Idle past 482 days)
Posts: 2
From: London, U.K.
Joined: 12-28-2015


Message 24 of 24 (775150)
12-29-2015 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by joecuddles
04-29-2015 8:48 AM


Spamoholics Anonymous
Hello all........
I was confused too when I read about humans evolution.

But because I am a scientist I was able to discover the truth about human evolution after a 10 year quest searching libraries and reading so many books

I now share the results of my 10 year quest about human evolution.

Visit my free eBook(edit)after I unmask myself and talk to the forum as fellow humans rather than simply spamming my book.

Godfrey Oswald
BSc, MSc, PhD
London, U.K.

Edited by AdminPhat, : Forcing Godfreys hand


This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by joecuddles, posted 04-29-2015 8:48 AM joecuddles has not yet responded

    
Prev1
2
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017