Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,815 Year: 3,072/9,624 Month: 917/1,588 Week: 100/223 Day: 11/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win.
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 328 of 2887 (774154)
12-13-2015 10:31 PM
Reply to: Message 325 by Big_Al35
12-13-2015 4:10 PM


That's right you haven't accepted anything. Infact none of you guys have. You operate like a collective. Are you and your forum buddies just one massive entity? You all share the same views and opinions? What kind of group think is this? You do know the globalists are masters of mind-control?
Yes, why else do we all think that two plus two is four, rather than five, or seventeen, or a small yak called Ethel? Such uniformity of opinion can only be caused by the globalists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 325 by Big_Al35, posted 12-13-2015 4:10 PM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 329 by Big_Al35, posted 12-14-2015 3:20 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
 Message 333 by AZPaul3, posted 12-14-2015 7:30 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 340 of 2887 (774212)
12-14-2015 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 337 by Big_Al35
12-14-2015 1:11 PM


Sure people make stuff up. But why would you carefully handcraft a skull with such great precision. Money? Well they aren't getting any from me. Not only that by why would many many different countries craft the same elongated type skulls over and over again. Who benefits? The museums? Well you aren't jumping on the first flight there are you? Do you think it might be the globalists? And as for extracting DNA from a plastic replica, I guess they are just getting bolder with their lies.
One more time. Everyone you're talking to believes the skulls are genuine.
If you wish to argue with us, you need to put forward a proposition that we don't believe, and not a proposition that we all say is undoubtedly true.
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 337 by Big_Al35, posted 12-14-2015 1:11 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 348 of 2887 (774242)
12-15-2015 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 342 by Big_Al35
12-14-2015 3:41 PM


Which ever excuse works best eh. So based on this pattern I kinda figure that giant skeletons really do exist.
Could I remind you once more that we have the skeletons that go with the skulls and they are not giant. This is evidence against your thesis that they are giant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 342 by Big_Al35, posted 12-14-2015 3:41 PM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 363 of 2887 (775184)
12-29-2015 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 356 by Big_Al35
12-29-2015 9:04 AM


Actually I have - but you chose to ignore it. Megalithic structures eg the Sacsayhauman.
You know that normal-sized people can move rocks, right? So why are rocks evidence of giants rather than of normal people, or for that matter aliens as you would doubtless be insisting if you were a different sort of kook?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 356 by Big_Al35, posted 12-29-2015 9:04 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(5)
Message 366 of 2887 (775195)
12-29-2015 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 356 by Big_Al35
12-29-2015 9:04 AM


Actually I have - but you chose to ignore it. Megalithic structures eg the Sacsayhauman.
Fun fact, when Anglo-Saxons saw Roman remains they identified them as entageweorc --- "the work of giants". But there was some excuse for their confusion --- the Roman remains were indeed beyond anything they could build, and so they might be excused for attributing its construction to superhumans.
But we, Big Al, we can build skyscrapers literally half a mile high, and yet you look at this ...
... and convince yourself that it couldn't have been done by ordinary humans like us, who can only do stuff like this:

This message is a reply to:
 Message 356 by Big_Al35, posted 12-29-2015 9:04 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 367 by Big_Al35, posted 01-01-2016 7:12 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 369 of 2887 (775442)
01-01-2016 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 367 by Big_Al35
01-01-2016 7:12 PM


Compare the Statue of Liberty with the ancient monoliths.
Following its completion in France it was shipped to the U.S; broken down into 350 pieces that were packed into 214 crates.
The steel and copper construction has a combined weight of 250-tons. Two and half million stones went into the Great Pyramid and the estimated weight is 6 million tons! The largest stone blocks in the pyramid weigh about 70 tons. However, there are numerous 40, 100, 200 and a few 400-ton blocks of precisely cut stones in Peru that had to be hauled a considerable distance and then fit into place at various sites.
The weight of the stones rather than the height or the complexity appears to be the main issue here.
Source --> Page not found - WORLD MYSTERIES
The largest monolith ever transported is the Thunder Stone, weighing 1500 tons. As it was moved in the late eighteenth century, we know exactly how it was done. Here's a picture. Note the absence of giants.
It follows that moving big rocks is not evidence of giants, since it can be done without giants.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 367 by Big_Al35, posted 01-01-2016 7:12 PM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 370 by Big_Al35, posted 01-02-2016 11:23 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(1)
Message 371 of 2887 (775528)
01-02-2016 12:17 PM
Reply to: Message 370 by Big_Al35
01-02-2016 11:23 AM


You will notice that the ancient stones have been transported much further distances.
And that they're smaller, and that the one you cite was transported by ship. Ships work without giants. Cargo ships have been built that can transport over 200,000 tons, all without any giants being involved.
How the ancients did so again and again, rock after rock is a mystery.
Only to you.
Even your picture shows that hundreds of regular sized people are needed and I am not sure of its validity.
Yes, hundreds of regular-sized people are needed. 'Cos of rocks being heavy.
Why are you "not sure of its validity"? Do you think the Russians secretly used giants to move the Thunder Stone but didn't tell anyone?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 370 by Big_Al35, posted 01-02-2016 11:23 AM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 374 by Big_Al35, posted 01-02-2016 4:13 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 377 of 2887 (775578)
01-02-2016 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 374 by Big_Al35
01-02-2016 4:13 PM


Why do you trust the information provided by the globalists without question?
If you mean, why am I not ignoring all the available evidence so as to retreat into a fantasy world of my own devising, it's because I'm not stark raving mad.
And I notice you haven't even mentioned the giant tools. Why not?
What are you talking about? You haven't even mentioned them. That was the first use of the word "tools" on this thread, and it's to complain that I haven't mentioned them?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 374 by Big_Al35, posted 01-02-2016 4:13 PM Big_Al35 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 378 by Big_Al35, posted 01-03-2016 5:53 AM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 381 of 2887 (775622)
01-03-2016 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 378 by Big_Al35
01-03-2016 5:53 AM


There are plenty of sites which mention giant tools. A proper study on the subject would at least discuss their authenticity but your omission is interesting.
But not as interesting as your omission. Here you are supposedly arguing for the existence of giants, and yet you never mentioned these giant tools. Are you one of ... the globalists? What else are you hiding?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 378 by Big_Al35, posted 01-03-2016 5:53 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 382 by Coragyps, posted 01-03-2016 10:47 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(5)
Message 383 of 2887 (775626)
01-03-2016 11:25 AM


Proof at last!

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 388 of 2887 (775936)
01-06-2016 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 386 by Big_Al35
01-06-2016 9:17 AM


Did I miss anything of the list?
Well, there's the bit where you were wrong, we proved you were wrong, you know you were wrong, so now all you have left is whining about how we proved you were wrong as though that was somehow our fault rather than your fault for being wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 386 by Big_Al35, posted 01-06-2016 9:17 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(4)
Message 391 of 2887 (775965)
01-07-2016 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 389 by Big_Al35
01-07-2016 4:12 AM


Thanks guys ... I think I did miss something of the list.
Yes. There's the bit where we proved you were wrong.
The pointy skulls are not evidence of giants, because they go with normal-sized skeletons.
People moving big rocks is not evidence of giants, because people have moved even bigger rocks without giants.
If there's nothing else you'd like to present as evidence, we're done here. Thanks for playing, you didn't win anything but you have our best wishes and our fervent hope that one day you'll make a full recovery.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by Big_Al35, posted 01-07-2016 4:12 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(3)
Message 414 of 2887 (776196)
01-09-2016 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 405 by jar
01-09-2016 5:23 PM


Al, do you actually have any evidence that there is such a thing as a globalist?
If there were globalists they'd conceal the evidence for giants, you must at least concede that. And have you seen any evidence for giants? Well then.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 405 by jar, posted 01-09-2016 5:23 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 415 by jar, posted 01-09-2016 10:46 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 426 of 2887 (776286)
01-11-2016 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 419 by Big_Al35
01-11-2016 9:38 AM


Imagine the globalists have plans A, B, C, D, E and F. Now imagine that plan F was to supress all knowledge of giants. It's hard to understand why they would want to do that isn't it?
But if you have an inkling of what other globalist plans there are on the table it might be easier to believe that they want to proceed with plan F too. I know you are now going to ask me 'what are their other plans'? Well if you were to ask me that question it suggests to me that you have no idea of ANY globalist plans. Heck, some have even asked me what the hell a globalist is.
This says to me that you need to do some background reading first. I can't and more importantly won't do this for you. Some here would like it if I spoon fed them all the data but sadly that's not going to happen. Others might already have the information and some won't lift so much as a finger to find out. That's up to them.
So the ball is pretty much in your court. If you don't know what a globalist is - YOU need to find out. If you don't know ANY of their plans - YOU need to find out. And if you don't want to find out - I couldn't give a monkeys.
But I do remember Big Al being so much smarter than this. He used to be pretty much the most reasonable creationist we had. And he never mentioned the evil globalists.
So, I'm gonna call it. Big Al, you're just trolling us now, aren't you? You're having fun, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 419 by Big_Al35, posted 01-11-2016 9:38 AM Big_Al35 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 284 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


(2)
Message 429 of 2887 (797350)
01-17-2017 10:19 PM


Sucky Whale
An interesting new intermediate form is described here.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024