Summations Only

It's not a matter of accepting that the picture is an accurate representation. The point is that if you do not believe humans can move rocks of such size, then you believe there were giants moving rocks in the 18th century, not only in the ancient past. Probably because this is the first time you have mentioned them. Seems to make more sense to dicuss the silly ideas you propose, instead of picking any old silly idea at random.

If you mean, why am I not ignoring all the available evidence so as to retreat into a fantasy world of my own devising, it's because I'm not stark raving mad. What are you talking about? You haven't even mentioned them. That was the first use of the word "tools" on this thread, and it's to complain that I haven't mentioned them?Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

There are plenty of sites which mention giant utensils. A proper study on the subject would at least discuss their authenticity but your omission is interesting. And if you claim to have an interest in paleontology or history or science then I am sure you would be aware of them.But then why would you bring them up. The strategy here has always been to dispatch with a nuisance forum member as quickly, and efficiently as possible. In this spirit it would make sense that you form a battle front with lines of defence each serving a different purpose but each one becoming increasingly more ruthless. I am no military expert but I would imagine your processing of a difficult forum member might follow these guidelines.1) Never volunteer any information - let them volunteer information
2) Never make proposals - let them make proposals
3) Never offer evidence - let them offer evidenceOnce the victim has volunteered, proposed or offered you can then go on the offensive with1) It doesn't exist
2) It's fake
3) Nit pick the minutiae of their posts and attempt to tear it apart.
4) I don't know what you're talking about
5) You are a buffoon or stark raving mad.
6) Launch personal attacks.
7) Turn the whole debate into a debacle using comedy, innuendo, false flags and strawman tactics.Nice work guys. You are doing a fine job on the front line.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

That you keep droning on about mythical giants and globalist conspiracies, along with your insistence that you don't have to provide any evidence for your outlandish theories while simultaneously demanding to be believed at face value alone, means that you're not here to have a serious debate.You should come to expect the reactions you've received.

Prove it. List those sites with references to the literature.

But not as interesting as your omission. Here you are supposedly arguing for the existence of giants, and yet you never mentioned these giant tools. Are you one of ... the globalists? What else are you hiding?

Well, let's start with Big Al's screen name. It may be open to interpretation as meaning that Big Al is himself a giant tool. And maybe even a globalist - our planet is, after all, pretty large.

Proof at last!

Seriously,This thing with giants seems to be your hobby. This stuff has been exposed as fraudulent a long time ago. If you think there is some evidence that it is not, then you are going to have to present it. Yet another excuse for not handling your part of the conversation. There is no evidence. There is just BS on a web page.

HBD*** Who would of thought there would be a meme about giant utensils???

Did I miss anything of the list?

"Once the victim has volunteered, proposed or offered..."You forgot to volunteer, propose or offer any evidence.All you need to do is present convincing evidence, and that's the one thing you have failed to do.By the way, "evidence" doesn't mean the type of things you have presented that don't stand up to the least scrutiny. For example, you're trying to tell me normal deformed skulls are aliens of some kind when I've analyzed perhaps a thousand skeletons and have seen most kinds of cranial deformation in the western US.

Well, there's the bit where you were wrong, we proved you were wrong, you know you were wrong, so now all you have left is whining about how we proved you were wrong as though that was somehow our fault rather than your fault for being wrong.

Thanks guys ... I think I did miss something of the list. So at number 8 we have;

Hey Al, quit the fake martyr stuff and give us something to examine.It would be great for both science and religion to find good evidence for giants. Science has nothing against giants except it hasn't found them. If and when it does, they'll be part of our Paleontological history, put in all the books and the finder will be world famous.So let's see it.