Summations Only

You say trained - I say programmed. Do you really know this or were you taught it? Who cares about credentials. I can listen to someone with a nobel prize or someone with no credentials and yet reject them both the same. Sure people make stuff up. But why would you carefully handcraft a skull with such great precision. Money? Well they aren't getting any from me. Not only that by why would many many different countries craft the same elongated type skulls over and over again. Who benefits? The museums? Well you aren't jumping on the first flight there are you? Do you think it might be the globalists? And as for extracting DNA from a plastic replica, I guess they are just getting bolder with their lies.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

But training doesn't rely on facts. It relies on what you been told to believe. You said we. So again you are relying on what someone else has informed you. But I know that it is the reputable scientists who do most of the fabrication. They must do because other scientists don't get a look in. First you didn't read my link, then you claimed that it was just head binding, others are claiming a deformity, another claimed it would dent the tour business and that it was a fabrication. Yet another discredited the credentials. There seems to be a pattern emerging here; along the lines that the globalists would use as I had suggested earlier. You're not working for them are you? Silly me, of course you are - aren't we all?The single parietal bone would be the key piece of evidence supporting this new species theory along with the DNA but we wouldn't have even got into a discussion about that if I had simply rolled over under the pressure of the 'head binding' argument. Ofcourse, we might not even had the discussion about head binding if you could have gotten away with the 'they don't exist' argument. But you had already used that excuse on the 'giant skeletons' parley earlier.Which ever excuse works best eh. So based on this pattern I kinda figure that giant skeletons really do exist.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

Actually I have - but you chose to ignore it. Megalithic structures eg the Sacsayhauman.Anyway, it is not my place to provide evidence. You can do your own research if you want. And if you don't want to that's fine too. I'm not sure why you need proof or evidence. It's a stale subject area and only those who can be arsed are going to bother. Even the evidence I have provided is only for my benefit. I only offer it in case you are interested and I certainly wouldn't provide it to those who demand it.

No - it is not my place to provide evidence. And on this point I am quite happy to be barred if this is so.And even though it is not my place to provide evidence I have done so. Which I notice you have ignored - again.

Compare the Statue of Liberty with the ancient monoliths.Following its completion in France it was shipped to the U.S; broken down into 350 pieces that were packed into 214 crates.The steel and copper construction has a combined weight of 250-tons. Two and half million stones went into the Great Pyramid and the estimated weight is 6 million tons! The largest stone blocks in the pyramid weigh about 70 tons. However, there are numerous 40, 100, 200 and a few 400-ton blocks of precisely cut stones in Peru that had to be hauled a considerable distance and then fit into place at various sites.The weight of the stones rather than the height or the complexity appears to be the main issue here.Source --> Page not found - WORLD MYSTERIES

Here are some interesting facts I got from Wikipedia. (controlled by globalists)1,250 t[19] Thunder Stone Boulder, Statue pedestal Saint Petersburg, Russia Russian Empire, 1770 Moved 6 km overland for shipment,[19] and cut from 1,500 t to current size while on transport[20]1,000 t[21][22] Ramesseum Statue Thebes, Egypt Ancient Egypt Transported 170 miles (270 km) by ship from AswanYou can see the ancient stones (in some cases) are comparable in size. You will notice that the ancient stones have been transported much further distances. The thunder stone was only transported 6km and probably only to show that it is possible in the modern age to do so. How the ancients did so again and again, rock after rock is a mystery. Even your picture shows that hundreds of regular sized people are needed and I am not sure of its validity.

Why do you trust the information provided by the globalists without question?And I notice you haven't even mentioned the giant tools. Why not?

Ahhh yes, I had missed off 'personal attacks' on my globalist strategy list.

There are plenty of sites which mention giant utensils. A proper study on the subject would at least discuss their authenticity but your omission is interesting. And if you claim to have an interest in paleontology or history or science then I am sure you would be aware of them.But then why would you bring them up. The strategy here has always been to dispatch with a nuisance forum member as quickly, and efficiently as possible. In this spirit it would make sense that you form a battle front with lines of defence each serving a different purpose but each one becoming increasingly more ruthless. I am no military expert but I would imagine your processing of a difficult forum member might follow these guidelines.1) Never volunteer any information - let them volunteer information
2) Never make proposals - let them make proposals
3) Never offer evidence - let them offer evidenceOnce the victim has volunteered, proposed or offered you can then go on the offensive with1) It doesn't exist
2) It's fake
3) Nit pick the minutiae of their posts and attempt to tear it apart.
4) I don't know what you're talking about
5) You are a buffoon or stark raving mad.
6) Launch personal attacks.
7) Turn the whole debate into a debacle using comedy, innuendo, false flags and strawman tactics.Nice work guys. You are doing a fine job on the front line.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

Did I miss anything of the list?

Thanks guys ... I think I did miss something of the list. So at number 8 we have;

Well if you were a globalist, what would be the best way to supress genuine photos of giants? A creative competition such as the worth1000 encouraging outrageous images and fakery. These fake images can then be circulated and promoted. Soon they will be as numerous as the genuine shots and nobody except the experts will be able to distinguish between them. Anyone with a genuine shot can then be silenced or brow beaten and the 'so called authorities' can claim it was fake all along like all the rest. Yet another globalist strategy. Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

See, you guys are just as capable of using google as I am.Edited by Big_Al35, : No reason given.

Imagine the globalists have plans A, B, C, D, E and F. Now imagine that plan F was to supress all knowledge of giants. It's hard to understand why they would want to do that isn't it?But if you have an inkling of what other globalist plans there are on the table it might be easier to believe that they want to proceed with plan F too. I know you are now going to ask me 'what are their other plans'? Well if you were to ask me that question it suggests to me that you have no idea of ANY globalist plans. Heck, some have even asked me what the hell a globalist is.This says to me that you need to do some background reading first. I can't and more importantly won't do this for you. Some here would like it if I spoon fed them all the data but sadly that's not going to happen. Others might already have the information and some won't lift so much as a finger to find out. That's up to them.So the ball is pretty much in your court. If you don't know what a globalist is - YOU need to find out. If you don't know ANY of their plans - YOU need to find out. And if you don't want to find out - I couldn't give a monkeys.