|
Author
|
Topic: People ARE Mixing the Gospels Together!
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Stars
Bob Bobber writes: Maybe we should go to the stars.
You're dodging. That's not a good sign that you have a strong case.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 223 by Bob Bobber, posted 03-12-2016 11:01 AM | | Bob Bobber has not replied |
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Errors of Dispensationalism: Old and New Testaments are One Whole
Bob Bobber writes: Prove it didn't happen?
Are you asking me to prove it didn't happen? That's not the way it works. If you claim to believe the Bible and you want to make a point from the Bible, you're the one who has to back up your claim.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Stars
Bob Bobber writes: What does the Sphinx mean to you?
A sphinx is a mythological creature, like a Grinch or a flying pig. When you refer to "the" sphinx, do you mean the sculpture near the Great Pyramids in Egypt? Are you going to tell us it's a landing beacon for UFOs?
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Errors of Dispensationalism: Old and New Testaments are One Whole
Bob Bobber writes: You need to establish for me that the second Adams did not have to fall on that Ark.
No I don't. You made the claim. You have to back it up.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Stars
Bob Bobber writes: What does that sphinx mean to you. Need a clue, it has to do the stars.
Maybe you should stick to one pile of rubbish at a time.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Errors of Dispensationalism: Old and New Testaments are One Whole
Bob Bobber writes: No, prove that blood did not have to fall on that Ark.
As I said, that's not the way it works. YOU have to show that the blood DID "have to" fall on the Ark. Book, chapter and verse. Until you tell us what your reasoning is, there's no way to respond to it.
Bob Bobber writes: I will shut up then, shut my mouth please.
I don't want you to shut up. I want you to tell us what your reasoning is, with book, chapter and verse from the Bible.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Stars
Bob Bobber writes: How can we reason out the stars, when you do not know where to start reading them.
What do the stars have to do with the topic? Are you deliberately being evasive? You need to SHOW us your reasoning - using book, chapter and verse - about the "flood' in Genesis 1, the blood on the Ark, etc. PUT SOMETHING up for us to discuss.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Errors of Dispensationalism: Old and New Testaments are One Whole
Bob Bobber writes: You are not hear to learn.
How can we learn if you won't show us your reasoning? Show us why the blood "had" to fall on the Ark, show us any evidence that it did, and then we can discuss.
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Stars
Bob Bobber writes: Do your own research on my question!
I've done my research and it shows that your conclusions are nonsense. You're the one who need to present something. If you want people to understand your reasoning, you need to show us what it is. So far it seems like there is no reasoning behind your bizarre claims. If you don't show us what your reasoning is, you're just wasting your time here.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 244 by Bob Bobber, posted 03-12-2016 12:01 PM | | Bob Bobber has not replied |
|
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: 03-23-2005
|
Re: The Errors of Dispensationalism: Old and New Testaments are One Whole
Bob Bobber writes: Do the research that needs to be done to shut my mouth, if you can.
Your mouth is already shut. That's the problem. Tell us what your reasoning is. Edited by ringo, : spelling.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 246 by Bob Bobber, posted 03-12-2016 12:03 PM | | Bob Bobber has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2